BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

642 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15136079)

  • 1. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1999 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Nov; 78(5):918-31. PubMed ID: 12413974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Jan; 77(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 11779586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):798-807. PubMed ID: 10231036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 9531864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):641-53; discussion 653-4. PubMed ID: 11020500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Nov; 66(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 8893670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jul; 64(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7789548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1121-8. PubMed ID: 7957974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technologies in Thailand: 2001-2007 results generated from the ART Registry, Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
    Vutyavanich T; Piromlertamorn W; Ellis J; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Mar; 37(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 21272157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology generated from the American Fertility Society Registry.
    Fertil Steril; 1993 May; 59(5):956-62. PubMed ID: 8486195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
    Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
    Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.