These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15136092)
1. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Virro MR; Larson-Cook KL; Evenson DP Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 15136092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates. Lin MH; Kuo-Kuang Lee R; Li SH; Lu CH; Sun FJ; Hwu YM Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 17904130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Redefining the relationship between sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques. Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):356-64. PubMed ID: 16084876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Boe-Hansen GB; Fedder J; Ersbøll AK; Christensen P Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1576-82. PubMed ID: 16543258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of the sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation level, as measured by the sperm chromatin dispersion test, in the outcome of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Muriel L; Garrido N; Fernández JL; Remohí J; Pellicer A; de los Santos MJ; Meseguer M Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 16595214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI. Bungum M; Humaidan P; Spano M; Jepson K; Bungum L; Giwercman A Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1401-8. PubMed ID: 15117894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of an abnormal sperm chromatin structural assay (SCSA) on pregnancy outcome following (IVF) with ICSI in previous IVF failures. Check JH; Graziano V; Cohen R; Krotec J; Check ML Arch Androl; 2005; 51(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 15804866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Bungum M; Humaidan P; Axmon A; Spano M; Bungum L; Erenpreiss J; Giwercman A Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 16921163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome. Benchaib M; Lornage J; Mazoyer C; Lejeune H; Salle B; François Guerin J Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 17074327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on ART outcome]. Guérin P; Matillon C; Bleau G; Lévy R; Ménézo Y Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Sep; 33(9):665-8. PubMed ID: 16137906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sperm chromatin integrity test for predicting the outcomes of IVF and ICSI]. Jiang HH; He XJ; Song B; Cao YX Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Dec; 17(12):1083-6. PubMed ID: 22235675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART. Bungum M; Spanò M; Humaidan P; Eleuteri P; Rescia M; Giwercman A Hum Reprod; 2008 Jan; 23(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 17986484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are sperm DNA fragmentation, hyperactivation, and hyaluronan-binding ability predictive for fertilization and embryo development in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Pregl Breznik B; Kovačič B; Vlaisavljević V Fertil Steril; 2013 Apr; 99(5):1233-41. PubMed ID: 23290739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes. van der Westerlaken L; Naaktgeboren N; Verburg H; Dieben S; Helmerhorst FM Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 16595217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization. van der Westerlaken L; Helmerhorst F; Dieben S; Naaktgeboren N Fertil Steril; 2005 Mar; 83(3):612-7. PubMed ID: 15749489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm DNA fragmentation negatively correlates with velocity and fertilization rates but might not affect pregnancy rates. Huang CC; Lin DP; Tsao HM; Cheng TC; Liu CH; Lee MS Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 16009168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-individual variation in sperm chromatin structure assay parameters in men from infertile couples: clinical implications. Erenpreiss J; Bungum M; Spano M; Elzanaty S; Orbidans J; Giwercman A Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2061-4. PubMed ID: 16684843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure. Van Landuyt L; De Vos A; Joris H; Verheyen G; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem A Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1397-403. PubMed ID: 15866575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of total antioxidant capacity in the differential growth of human embryos in vitro. Bedaiwy M; Agarwal A; Said TM; Goldberg JM; Sharma RK; Worley S; Falcone T Fertil Steril; 2006 Aug; 86(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 16769062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]