BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1513672)

  • 1. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
    O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
    Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.
    Gillam B; Borsting E
    Perception; 1988; 17(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 3249668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal properties of disparity processing revealed by dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Perception; 2005; 34(10):1205-19. PubMed ID: 16309115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms.
    Bradshaw MF; Rogers BJ; De Bruyn B
    Perception; 1995; 24(7):749-59. PubMed ID: 8710438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereo transparency in ambiguous stereograms generated by overlapping two identical dot patterns.
    Watanabe O
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):24.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
    Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
    Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stereo and motion cues in preattentive vision processing--some experiments with random-dot stereographic image sequences.
    Pong TC; Kenner MA; Otis J
    Perception; 1990; 19(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 2235284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effects on depth perception and pattern recognition in random dot stereograms by changing the matrix dot density].
    Pressmar SB; Haase W
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Oct; 98(10):955-9. PubMed ID: 11699317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Texture discrimination at the cyclopean retina.
    Pérez-Martínez D
    Perception; 1995; 24(7):771-86. PubMed ID: 8710440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereograms.
    Frisby JP; Mayhew JE
    Perception; 1978; 7(6):661-78. PubMed ID: 740507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ecologically invalid monocular texture leads to longer perceptual latencies in random-dot stereograms.
    Grove PM; Ono H
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):627-39. PubMed ID: 10664759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpolation of forms in random-dot stereograms with varying dot densities.
    Kobayashi I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1361-2. PubMed ID: 8170791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S; Bedell HE
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing Motion-In-Depth Perception of Random-Dot Stereograms.
    Zhang D; Nourrit V; De Bougrenet de la Tocnaye JL
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):722-734. PubMed ID: 29914316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Single Mechanism Can Account for Human Perception of Depth in Mixed Correlation Random Dot Stereograms.
    Henriksen S; Cumming BG; Read JC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004906. PubMed ID: 27196696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the apparent collapse of stereopsis in random-dot-stereograms at isoluminance.
    Kingdom FA; Simmons DR; Rainville S
    Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2127-41. PubMed ID: 10343795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Form and depth in global stereopsis.
    Chung CS; Berbaum K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Apr; 10(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 6232344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.