BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15136792)

  • 1. Prospects for productivity.
    Booth B; Zemmel R
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 May; 3(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 15136792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drug pipeline: 3Q15.
    DeFrancesco L
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1126. PubMed ID: 26544135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Market watch: Upcoming catalysts in Q1 2015.
    Uribe A
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2015 Jan; 14(1):9. PubMed ID: 25503330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks--2003.
    Walsh G
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):865-70. PubMed ID: 12894198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Market watch: Upcoming market catalysts in Q4 2016.
    Hansen T
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2016 Sep; 15(10):671. PubMed ID: 27681788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A merger too far?
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7131):15. PubMed ID: 17330017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Key factors in the rising cost of new drug discovery and development.
    Dickson M; Gagnon JP
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2004 May; 3(5):417-29. PubMed ID: 15136789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Upcoming market catalysts in Q4 2019.
    Ranj T
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2019 Sep; 18(10):738. PubMed ID: 31570850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. User fees to hasten FDA review.
    Gershon D
    Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6396):567. PubMed ID: 1406982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concerns raised over declining antiinfectives R&D.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1255-6. PubMed ID: 14595340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A changing drug supply.
    Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7127):460. PubMed ID: 17268432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Market watch: upcoming market catalysts in Q4 2010.
    Rosenthal J
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2010 Oct; 9(10):755. PubMed ID: 20885399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Security market reaction to FDA fast track designations.
    Anderson CW; Zhang Y
    J Health Care Finance; 2010; 37(2):27-48. PubMed ID: 21294437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FDA dependence on drug industry.
    Lawson GW
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2005 Jul; 97(7):1039-40. PubMed ID: 16080677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 2004 approvals: the demise of the blockbuster?
    Frantz S
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2005 Feb; 4(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 15756752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The drug that could have been.
    Schultz S
    US News World Rep; 2002 Aug; 133(7):18, 20-3. PubMed ID: 12195678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who pays what in drug development.
    Love J
    Nature; 1999 Jan; 397(6716):202. PubMed ID: 9930689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Letter from the Commissioner's Office at the US FDA.
    Vernon JA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(4):267-8. PubMed ID: 17402801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992: speeding up the drug approval process.
    Bierut MB
    Healthspan; 1992 Dec; 9(11):12-4. PubMed ID: 10123552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paying for drug approvals--who's using whom?
    Avorn J
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Apr; 356(17):1697-700. PubMed ID: 17435083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.