These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15137289)
1. Provision of a microbiological device evaluation service. Perry KR Commun Dis Public Health; 2004 Mar; 7(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 15137289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the IVD directive apply to culture media? Djemal K Commun Dis Public Health; 1999 Jan; 2(1):74. PubMed ID: 10462907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the merits of medical equipment. Wheeler J Med Prod Sales; 1981 Sep; 12(9):148-50. PubMed ID: 10253246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The elements of a complete product evaluation. Stiefel R; Rizkalla E Biomed Instrum Technol; 1995; 29(6):482-8. PubMed ID: 8574262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom. Akehurst R Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 20618794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The nurse's role in contributing to new device development. Weir H; Grocott P; Ram MB Nurs Times; 2006 Jun 27-Jul 3; 102(26):36-9. PubMed ID: 16845815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The UK market today and tomorrow. Kreuzer M Med Device Technol; 2002 Dec; 13(10):39-40. PubMed ID: 12575530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient transfer systems. Health Devices; 1989 May; 18(5):143-52. PubMed ID: 2634657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The status of modeled claims. Langley PC J Med Econ; 2015; 18(12):991-2. PubMed ID: 26549706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Medical device evaluation: what are the needs?]. Huot L; Decullier E; Aulagner G; Chapuis FR Presse Med; 2010 Oct; 39(10):1097-8. PubMed ID: 20634034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological indicators in the pharmaceutical and the medical device industry. Pflug IJ; Odlaug TE J Parenter Sci Technol; 1986; 40(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 3540254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. CE marking and medical device directives. Shedden DJ Commun Dis Public Health; 1999 Jan; 2(1):73. PubMed ID: 10462905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal medical device regulations: what are the implications for respiratory care? Gardner RM Respir Care; 1988 Apr; 33(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 10315749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The UK Department of Health and Social Security's Scientific and Technical Services Branch. Higson GR J Med Eng Technol; 1983; 7(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 6876133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A primer in technology assessment. Ackerman MH AACN Adv Crit Care; 2006; 17(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 16767010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Product evaluation is an integral part of the patient care environment. Deneselya JA SCI Nurs; 1995 Jun; 12(2):70. PubMed ID: 7624755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the operation of the automated microbiological system MS-2 from the company "Abbott Laboratories" (USA) in a clinical microbiological laboratory]. Gladshteĭn AI; Petrakov AA; Mel'nikova VM; Arutcheva AA Vopr Med Khim; 1991; 37(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 1897205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]