These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15137891)

  • 1. Determining the number of clusters by sampling with replacement.
    Tonidandel S; Overall JE
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Jun; 9(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15137891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clustering binary data in the presence of masking variables.
    Brusco MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):510-23. PubMed ID: 15598102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the bootstrap in analysing cost data from cluster randomised trials: some simulation results.
    Flynn TN; Peters TJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):33. PubMed ID: 15550169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profiling local optima in K-means clustering: developing a diagnostic technique.
    Steinley D
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):178-92. PubMed ID: 16784337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.
    Jiang W; Simon R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5320-34. PubMed ID: 17624926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing the number of clusters in Κ-means clustering.
    Steinley D; Brusco MJ
    Psychol Methods; 2011 Sep; 16(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 21728423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigations of dipole localization accuracy in MEG using the bootstrap.
    Darvas F; Rautiainen M; Pantazis D; Baillet S; Benali H; Mosher JC; Garnero L; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(2):355-68. PubMed ID: 15784414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of a Gibbs sampler method for model-based clustering of gene expression data.
    Joshi A; Van de Peer Y; Michoel T
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 18033794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2589-603. PubMed ID: 17094074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tight clustering: a resampling-based approach for identifying stable and tight patterns in data.
    Tseng GC; Wong WH
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15737073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting clusters of different geometrical shapes in microarray gene expression data.
    Kim DW; Lee KH; Lee D
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1927-34. PubMed ID: 15647300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cluster analysis as a method for determining size ranges for spinal implants: disc lumbar replacement prosthesis dimensions from magnetic resonance images.
    Lei D; Holder RL; Smith FW; Wardlaw D; Hukins DW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):2979-83; discussion 2984. PubMed ID: 17139231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of stability of k-means cluster ensembles with respect to random initialization.
    Kuncheva LI; Vetrov DP
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Nov; 28(11):1798-808. PubMed ID: 17063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using repeated measurements to validate hierarchical gene clusters.
    Bréhélin L; Gascuel O; Martin O
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 24(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 18204054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. K-means clustering versus validation measures: a data-distribution perspective.
    Xiong H; Wu J; Chen J
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2009 Apr; 39(2):318-31. PubMed ID: 19095536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weighted rank aggregation of cluster validation measures: a Monte Carlo cross-entropy approach.
    Pihur V; Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1607-15. PubMed ID: 17483500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How many samples are needed to build a classifier: a general sequential approach.
    Fu WJ; Dougherty ER; Mallick B; Carroll RJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 15297303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.