These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1513839)

  • 1. Reward summation and the effects of pimozide, clonidine, and amphetamine on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 1513839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative determination of the effects of catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation.
    Gallistel CR; Freyd G
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 Apr; 26(4):731-41. PubMed ID: 3602032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward summation and the effects of dopamine D1 and D2 agonists and antagonists on fixed-interval responding for brain stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM; Jackson DM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Aug; 48(4):853-62. PubMed ID: 7972288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dopaminergic and noradrenergic inhibition of hypothalamic self-stimulation: differentiation of reward and performance effects.
    Sinden JD; Atrens DM
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1982 Dec; 86(2):237-46. PubMed ID: 7160436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of pimozide and of reward omission on fixed-interval behavior of rats maintained by food and electrical brain stimulation.
    Greenshaw AJ; Sanger DJ; Blackman DE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Aug; 15(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 7312893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of d-amphetamine and of beta-phenylethylamine on fixed interval responding maintained by self-regulated lateral hypothalamic stimulation in rats.
    Greenshaw AJ; Sanger DJ; Blackman DE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Oct; 23(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 4070329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.
    Gallistel CR; Karras D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Jan; 20(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6695003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Main effects of current and pimozide on prepared and learned self-stimulation behaviors are on performance not reward.
    Mekarski JE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):845-53. PubMed ID: 3252276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nicotine and brain-stimulation reward: interactions with morphine, amphetamine and pimozide.
    Huston-Lyons D; Sarkar M; Kornetsky C
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Oct; 46(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 8265701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.
    Phillips G; Willner P; Sampson D; Nunn J; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 104(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 1881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociation of the attentional and motivational effects of pimozide on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation.
    Bird M; Kornetsky C
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 1990 Feb; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2137697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased lever pressing for amphetamine after pimozide in rats: implications for a dopamine theory of reward.
    Yokel RA; Wise RA
    Science; 1975 Feb; 187(4176):547-9. PubMed ID: 1114313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats.
    Porter JH; Villanueva HF
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Dec; 31(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 3252268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of pimozide on self-stimulation threshold under a continuous and fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.
    Boye SM; Rompré PP
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Aug; 78(2):243-5. PubMed ID: 8864057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation by pimozide of the suppressant effect of d-amphetamine on operant behaviour.
    Morley MJ; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 91(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 3107040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine.
    Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Sep; 40(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 6631310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric manipulations and fixed-interval self-stimulation.
    Hunt GE; Atrens DM
    Physiol Behav; 1992 May; 51(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 1615038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactions of naloxone with morphine, amphetamine and phencyclidine on fixed interval responding for intracranial self-stimulation in rats.
    Schaefer GJ; Michael RP
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1990; 102(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 2274609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of dopamine supersensitivity on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation in rats.
    Ettenberg A; Milner PM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1977 Dec; 7(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 563603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pimozide blocks reinforcement but not priming from MFB stimulation in the rat.
    Wasserman EM; Gomita Y; Gallistel CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 7178187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.