These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15139252)
1. Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? "The embedded researcher" as a methodological approach. Reiter-Theil S Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 15139252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Casuistry in medical ethics: rehabilitated, or repeat offender? Tomlinson T Theor Med; 1994 Mar; 15(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 8059432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Ethics, by A. Jonsen, M. Siegler, and W. Winslade. Brennan TA J Leg Med; 1993 Jun; 14(2):355-7. PubMed ID: 11643145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioethics as methodological case resolution: specification, specified principlism and casuistry. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 10852335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence-based ethics? On evidence-based practice and the "empirical turn" from normative bioethics. Goldenberg MJ BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Nov; 6():E11. PubMed ID: 16277663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What contributions have social science and the law made to the development of policy on bioethics? Capron AM Daedalus; 1999; 128(4):295-325. PubMed ID: 11645880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Missing the point: comments on the case presented by Barbara Edwards Commentary: the many styles of clinical ethics. O'Connell LJ; Yeide H J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 11642824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving forward in bioethical theory: theories, cases, and specified principlism. Degrazia D J Med Philos; 1992 Oct; 17(5):511-39. PubMed ID: 1431667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An anthropological exploration of contemporary bioethics: the varieties of common sense. Turner L J Med Ethics; 1998 Apr; 24(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 9603001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics. Strech D J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current empirical research in neonatal bioethics. Swinton CH; Lantos JD Acta Paediatr; 2010 Dec; 99(12):1773-81. PubMed ID: 20712838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Casuistry and narrative: of what relevance to HECs? Dubose ER; Hamel RP HEC Forum; 1995 Jul; 7(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 10151102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What really separates casuistry from principlism in biomedical ethics. Cudney P Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Jun; 35(3):205-29. PubMed ID: 24846659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Future ethical issues in neonatology: a Japanese perspective. Nishida H Semin Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 11(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 3616662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Researchers in Empirical Ethics Studies Have a Duty to Act Upon their Findings? Case Study in End-of-Life Decision Making. Winkler EC J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Dec; 14(5):438-440. PubMed ID: 31779540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bioethics in clinical practice]. Sánchez-Gonzaléz M; Herreros B Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2015; 53(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 25680645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical experts and Dr. Ethics. Fielder J IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1993 Dec; 12(4):116-9. PubMed ID: 11655087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An update on the "empirical turn" in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals. Wangmo T; Hauri S; Gennet E; Anane-Sarpong E; Provoost V; Elger BS BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 29415709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis. Borry P; Schotsmans P; Dierickx K Med Health Care Philos; 2004; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 15139254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]