These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15139752)

  • 1. Finding more needles in the haystack: A simple and efficient method for improving high-throughput docking results.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Thoma M; Acklin P; Davies JW
    J Med Chem; 2004 May; 47(11):2743-9. PubMed ID: 15139752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of a naive Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Med Chem; 2004 Aug; 47(18):4356-9. PubMed ID: 15317449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of machine learning to improve the results of high-throughput docking against the HIV-1 protease.
    Klon AE; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2216-24. PubMed ID: 15554692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New scoring functions for virtual screening from molecular dynamics simulations with a quantum-refined force-field (QRFF-MD). Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
    Ferrara P; Curioni A; Vangrevelinghe E; Meyer T; Mordasini T; Andreoni W; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):254-63. PubMed ID: 16426061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast structure-based virtual ligand screening combining FRED, DOCK, and Surflex.
    Miteva MA; Lee WH; Montes MO; Villoutreix BO
    J Med Chem; 2005 Sep; 48(19):6012-22. PubMed ID: 16162004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
    Bar-Haim S; Aharon A; Ben-Moshe T; Marantz Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of automated docking programs for docking and database screening against RNA drug targets.
    Detering C; Varani G
    J Med Chem; 2004 Aug; 47(17):4188-201. PubMed ID: 15293991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic and efficient decomposition of two-dimensional structures of small molecules for fragment-based high-throughput docking.
    Kolb P; Caflisch A
    J Med Chem; 2006 Dec; 49(25):7384-92. PubMed ID: 17149868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual screening of DNA minor groove binders.
    Evans DA; Neidle S
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jul; 49(14):4232-8. PubMed ID: 16821782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knowledge-based interaction fingerprint scoring: a simple method for improving the effectiveness of fast scoring functions.
    Mpamhanga CP; Chen B; McLay IM; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):686-98. PubMed ID: 16562999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for induced-fit docking, scoring, and ranking of flexible ligands. Application to peptidic and pseudopeptidic beta-secretase (BACE 1) inhibitors.
    Moitessier N; Therrien E; Hanessian S
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5885-94. PubMed ID: 17004704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considerations in compound database preparation--"hidden" impact on virtual screening results.
    Knox AJ; Meegan MJ; Carta G; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1908-19. PubMed ID: 16309298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of scoring functions on enrichment in docking-based virtual screening: an application study on renin inhibitors.
    Krovat EM; Langer T
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1123-9. PubMed ID: 15154781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enrichment of ligands for the serotonin receptor using the Shape Signatures approach.
    Nagarajan K; Zauhar R; Welsh WJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15667128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient in silico screening method based on the protein-compound affinity matrix and its application to the design of a focused library for cytochrome P450 (CYP) ligands.
    Fukunishi Y; Hojo S; Nakamura H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2610-22. PubMed ID: 17125201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.