553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15139848)
1. Effect of non-invasive calibration of radial waveforms on error in transfer-function-derived central aortic waveform characteristics.
Hope SA; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
Clin Sci (Lond); 2004 Aug; 107(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 15139848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transmission of calibration errors (input) by generalized transfer functions to the aortic pressures (output) at different hemodynamic states.
Papaioannou TG; Lekakis JP; Karatzis EN; Papamichael CM; Stamatelopoulos KS; Protogerou AD; Mavrikakis M; Stefanadis C
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 110(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16229910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The noninvasive estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis.
Rajani R; Chowienczyk P; Redwood S; Guilcher A; Chambers JB
J Hypertens; 2008 Dec; 26(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 19008716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 'Generalizability' of a radial-aortic transfer function for the derivation of central aortic waveform parameters.
Hope SA; Meredith IT; Tay D; Cameron JD
J Hypertens; 2007 Sep; 25(9):1812-20. PubMed ID: 17762645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.
Mahieu D; Kips J; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Verbeke F; Gillebert TC; De Backer GG; De Bacquer D; Verdonck P; Van Bortel LM; Segers P;
J Hypertens; 2010 Feb; 28(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19901847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive pulse waveform analysis in clinical trials: similarity of two methods for calculating aortic systolic pressure.
Adji A; Hirata K; Hoegler S; O'Rourke MF
Am J Hypertens; 2007 Aug; 20(8):917-22. PubMed ID: 17679043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of generalized transfer function-derived central blood pressure for the calculation of baroreflex gain.
Studinger P; Ungi I; Lénárd Z; Mersich B; Rudas L; Kollai M
J Hypertens; 2008 Jun; 26(6):1156-62. PubMed ID: 18475153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.
Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave.
Takazawa K; Kobayashi H; Shindo N; Tanaka N; Yamashina A
Hypertens Res; 2007 Mar; 30(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 17510503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-invasive model-based estimation of aortic pulse pressure using suprasystolic brachial pressure waveforms.
Lowe A; Harrison W; El-Aklouk E; Ruygrok P; Al-Jumaily AM
J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2111-5. PubMed ID: 19665136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of central aortic pressure by SphygmoCor requires intra-arterial peripheral pressures.
Cloud GC; Rajkumar C; Kooner J; Cooke J; Bulpitt CJ
Clin Sci (Lond); 2003 Aug; 105(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 12710885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the transfer function technique for generating central from peripheral upper limb pressure waveform.
Gallagher D; Adji A; O'Rourke MF
Am J Hypertens; 2004 Nov; 17(11 Pt 1):1059-67. PubMed ID: 15533735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two generalized transfer functions for measuring central systolic blood pressure by an oscillometric blood pressure monitor.
Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
J Hum Hypertens; 2013 Mar; 27(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 22551938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating central systolic blood pressure during oscillometric determination of blood pressure: proof of concept and validation by comparison with intra-aortic pressure recording and arterial tonometry.
Brett SE; Guilcher A; Clapp B; Chowienczyk P
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 22466804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cuff and aortic pressure differences during dobutamine infusion: a study of the effects of systolic blood pressure amplification.
Smulyan H; Mukherjee R; Sheehe PR; Safar ME
Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 20211301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure.
Kohara K; Tabara Y; Tomita H; Nagai T; Igase M; Miki T
J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Aug; 23(8):538-45. PubMed ID: 19129857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determining carotid artery pressure from scaled diameter waveforms: comparison and validation of calibration techniques in 2026 subjects.
Vermeersch SJ; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; De Bacquer D; De Backer G; Van Bortel LM; Gillebert TC; Verdonck PR; Segers P
Physiol Meas; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1267-80. PubMed ID: 18843161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients.
Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Keller E; Seifert B; Pasch T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 8665877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical use of indices determined non-invasively from the radial and carotid pressure waveforms.
Adji A; Hirata K; O'Rourke MF
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Aug; 11(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 16810032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
