These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15140175)

  • 21. Shading of ceramic crowns using digital tooth shade matching devices.
    Baltzer A; Kaufmann-Jinoian V
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Apr; 8(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 16201397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity and reliability of tooth color selection by smartphone photography and software applications.
    Mohammadi A; Bakhtiari Z; Mighani F; Bakhtiari F
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(3):281-286. PubMed ID: 34380816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
    Ahn JS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Color differences: polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab.
    Browning WD; Contreras-Bulnes R; Brackett MG; Brackett WW
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e34-9. PubMed ID: 19500895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of colour defective vision on shade matching accuracy.
    Ethell J; Jarad FD; Youngson CC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Sep; 14(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 17024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tooth shade selection using a colorimetric instrument compared with that using a conventional shade guide.
    Kuzmanović D; Lyons KM
    N Z Dent J; 2009 Dec; 105(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20000193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New shade guide for tooth whitening monitoring: visual assessment.
    Paravina RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 18319088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A study of color measurement for vital teeth using digital camera].
    Ge QM; Zhang FQ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Aug; 16(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17924021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dental shade matching using a digital camera.
    Tam WK; Lee HJ
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40 Suppl 2():e3-10. PubMed ID: 22713739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A digital image analysis system for the assessment of tooth whiteness compared to visual shade matching.
    Lath DL; Wildgoose DG; Guan YH; Lilley TH; Smith RN; Brook AH
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 17410951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Tooth color matching systems and communication with dental laboratory in indirect restorations: 2011 update].
    Ginzburg M; Gilboa I
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2012 Jan; 29(1):28-34, 64. PubMed ID: 22991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Dental Shade Guide Variability Using Cross-Polarized Photography.
    Gurrea J; Gurrea M; Bruguera A; Sampaio CS; Janal M; Bonfante E; Coelho PG; Hirata R
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(5):e76-81. PubMed ID: 27560681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human-eye versus computerized color matching.
    Yap AU; Sim CP; Loh WL; Teo JH
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):358-63. PubMed ID: 10823085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of individual shades on reliability and validity of observers in colour matching.
    Lagouvardos PE; Diamanti H; Polyzois G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Jun; 12(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 15244007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photometric assessment of tooth color using commonly available software.
    Denissen H; Dozic A
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(2):204-15. PubMed ID: 20589263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.