432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15140820)
1. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance tests for digital radiography in general dental practice.
Greenall C; Drage N; Ager M
Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):126-8, 131-4. PubMed ID: 24783881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.
Baksi BG; Alpöz E; Sogur E; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):424-30. PubMed ID: 20841460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
