These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15140821)

  • 1. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions.
    Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of lossy compression on diagnostic accuracy of radiographs for periapical lesions.
    Eraso FE; Analoui M; Watson AB; Rebeschini R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 12075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pixel intensity and fractal dimension of periapical lesions visually indiscernible in radiographs.
    Soğur E; Baksı BG; Gröndahl HG; Sen BH
    J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 23228251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
    Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; Sanderink GC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning?
    Soğur E; Gröndahl HG; Baksı BG; Mert A
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 22244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Meier AW; Brown CE; Miles DA; Analoui M
    J Endod; 1996 Oct; 22(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 9198437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of JPEG compression on the diagnostic accuracy of periapical images in the detection of root fracture.
    Noujeim M; Geha H; Shintaku W; Bechara B; Kashi KA
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Jun; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 22066949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions.
    Folk RB; Thorpe JR; McClanahan SB; Johnson JD; Strother JM
    J Endod; 2005 Apr; 31(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 15793390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12076050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.
    Baksi BG; Fidler A
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct digital lateral cephalometry: the effects of JPEG compression on image quality.
    Wenger NA; Tewson DH; McDonald F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 16290207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
    Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.