These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15140821)
21. CBCT-based evaluation of integrity of cortical sinus close to periapical lesions. Santos Junior O; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; Cavalcanti MG Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25590506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of data compression on proximal caries detection: observer performance with DenOptix photostimulable phosphor images. Pabla T; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Abreu M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12820853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Endodontic radiography: who is reading the digital radiograph? Tewary S; Luzzo J; Hartwell G J Endod; 2011 Jul; 37(7):919-21. PubMed ID: 21689544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography. Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Horasan S Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 20100921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images. Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs. Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Is JPEG compression of videomicroscopic images compatible with telediagnosis? Comparison between diagnostic performance and pattern recognition on uncompressed TIFF images and JPEG compressed ones. Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Righi E; Di Nardo A Telemed J E Health; 2004; 10(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 15650524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000. Kang BJ; Kim HS; Park CS; Choi JJ; Lee JH; Choi BG Clin Radiol; 2011 Jul; 66(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 21450282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics. Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Baker WA; Hearne SE; Spero LA; Morris KG; Harrington RA; Sketch MH; Behar VS; Kong Y; Peter RH; Bashore TM; Harrison JK; Cusma JT Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1157-64. PubMed ID: 9286944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. Kerensky RA; Cusma JT; Kubilis P; Simon R; Bashore TM; Hirshfeld JW; Holmes DR; Pepine CJ; Nissen SE J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 35(5):1370-9. PubMed ID: 10758987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy. Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study. Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reproducibility of and file format effect on digital subtraction radiography of simulated external root resorptions. Gegler A; Mahl C; Fontanella V Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16421257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Kullendorff B; Nilsson M Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Brennecke R; Bürgel U; Rippin G; Post F; Rupprecht HJ; Meyer J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Feb; 17(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11495503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An observation of the healing process of periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography. Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):589-91. PubMed ID: 12184420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital storage of echocardiograms offers superior image quality to analog storage, even with 20:1 digital compression: results of the Digital Echo Record Access Study. Karson TH; Zepp RC; Chandra S; Morehead A; Thomas JD J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1996; 9(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 8943436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of compression on the image quality of digital panoramic radiographs. Yasar F; Yesilova E; Apaydın B Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):719-26. PubMed ID: 21732088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]