129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15141118)
1. Comparison of methods based on diversity and similarity for molecule selection and the analysis of drug discovery data.
Lam RL; Welch WJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():301-16. PubMed ID: 15141118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases.
Pötter T; Matter H
J Med Chem; 1998 Feb; 41(4):478-88. PubMed ID: 9484498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
Mohr JA; Jain BJ; Obermayer K
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1868-81. PubMed ID: 18767832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships between Molecular Complexity, Biological Activity, and Structural Diversity.
Schuffenhauer A; Brown N; Selzer P; Ertl P; Jacoby E
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):525-35. PubMed ID: 16562980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular similarity concepts and search calculations.
Auer J; Bajorath J
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 453():327-47. PubMed ID: 18712312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mapping algorithms for molecular similarity analysis and ligand-based virtual screening: design of DynaMAD and comparison with MAD and DMC.
Eckert H; Vogt I; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1623-34. PubMed ID: 16859294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cell-integral-diversity criterion: a proposal for minimizing cluster artifact in cell-based selections.
Rabal O; Pascual R; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1886-96. PubMed ID: 17824683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Partitioning in binary-transformed chemical descriptor spaces.
Godden JW; Bajorath J
Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():291-300. PubMed ID: 15141117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible 3D pharmacophores as descriptors of dynamic biological space.
Nettles JH; Jenkins JL; Williams C; Clark AM; Bender A; Deng Z; Davies JW; Glick M
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Oct; 26(3):622-33. PubMed ID: 17395510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches.
Eckert H; Bajorath J
Drug Discov Today; 2007 Mar; 12(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 17331887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases.
Medina-Franco JL; Maggiora GM; Giulianotti MA; Pinilla C; Houghten RA
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17927720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ligand-based virtual screening and in silico design of new antimalarial compounds using nonstochastic and stochastic total and atom-type quadratic maps.
Marrero-Ponce Y; Iyarreta-Veitía M; Montero-Torres A; Romero-Zaldivar C; Brandt CA; Avila PE; Kirchgatter K; Machado Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):1082-100. PubMed ID: 16045304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SwiFT: an index structure for reduced graph descriptors in virtual screening and clustering.
Fischer JR; Rarey M
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1341-53. PubMed ID: 17567122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of juvenile hormone mimetic compounds for Culex pipiens larvae, with a discussion of descriptor-thinning methods.
Basak SC; Natarajan R; Mills D; Hawkins DM; Kraker JJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 16426041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selection of molecules based on shape and electrostatic similarity: proof of concept of "electroforms".
Jennings A; Tennant M
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(5):1829-38. PubMed ID: 17824684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canonical Measure of Correlation (CMC) and Canonical Measure of Distance (CMD) between sets of data. Part 1. Theory and simple chemometric applications.
Todeschini R; Ballabio D; Consonni V; Manganaro A; Mauri A
Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Aug; 648(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 19616688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. QSPR model of Henry's law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach.
Modarresi H; Modarress H; Dearden JC
Chemosphere; 2007 Feb; 66(11):2067-76. PubMed ID: 17113627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance.
Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
