These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15141920)

  • 1. Concurrent validity of tests to measure the coordinated exertion of force by computerized target pursuit.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S; Kitabayashi T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Apr; 98(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 15141920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships among coordinated exertion of force and performance on pegboard and pursuit rotor tests using upper limbs and fingers.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Dec; 99(3 Pt 1):1053-60. PubMed ID: 15648508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of a computerized target-pursuit system for measuring coordinated exertion of force.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S; Nakada M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Jun; 96(3 Pt 2):1071-85. PubMed ID: 12929759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of an apparatus to estimate coordinated exertion of force.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 1):899-913. PubMed ID: 12081296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ability to coordinate exertion of force by the dominant hand: comparisons among university students and 65- to 78-year-old men and women.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S; Yamaji S; Kobayashi H; Matsuzawa J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):995-1007. PubMed ID: 10883791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of controlled force exertion measurements computed by a quasi-random target-pursuit system.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):366-78. PubMed ID: 20499549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences between the controlled force exertion measured by a computer-generated sinusoidal and a bar chart display.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S; Takahashi K
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2013; 57(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 23571130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled exertion of force by developmentally delayed young men and women.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):487-97. PubMed ID: 16383083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority of the dominant and nondominant hands in static strength and controlled force exertion.
    Noguchi T; Demura S; Aoki H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Oct; 109(2):339-46. PubMed ID: 20037986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Provisional norms by age group for Japanese females on the controlled force-exertion test using a bar-chart display.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):785-94. PubMed ID: 18712200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Provisional norms by age group for Japanese women on the controlled force exertion test using a quasi-random display.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Apr; 110(2):613-24. PubMed ID: 20499570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Force developmental phase and reliability in explosive and voluntary grip exertions.
    Demura S; Yamaji S; Nagasawa Y; Ikemoto Y; Shimada S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1009-21. PubMed ID: 11565909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laterality and age-level differences between young women and elderly women in controlled force exertion (CFE).
    Kubota H; Demura S; Kawabata H
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012; 54(2):e68-72. PubMed ID: 21930309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and sex differences of controlled force exertion measured by a computer-generated sinusoidal target-pursuit system.
    Nagasawa Y; Demura S
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2009 Jun; 28(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 19652452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the accuracy of the psychophysical approach to grip force measurement.
    King PM; Finet M
    J Hand Ther; 2004; 17(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 15538682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximal dynamic grip force and wrist torque: the effects of gender, exertion direction, angular velocity, and wrist angle.
    Morse JL; Jung MC; Bashford GR; Hallbeck MS
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Nov; 37(6):737-42. PubMed ID: 16442072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength.
    Shechtman O; Hope LM; Sindhu BS
    J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(4):326-34; quiz 335. PubMed ID: 17954353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-session and inter-day reliability of forearm surface EMG during varying hand grip forces.
    Hashemi Oskouei A; Paulin MG; Carman AB
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Feb; 23(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 22999075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences and properties of the decreasing force during sustained static grip at various target forces.
    Yamaji S; Demura S; Nakada M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Aug; 103(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 17037641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of grip force and subjective hand force exertion under handedness and postural conditions.
    Li KW; Yu R
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Nov; 42(6):929-33. PubMed ID: 21439549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.