These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15141926)

  • 21. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?
    Ulrich R; Mattes S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):972-90. PubMed ID: 8962543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduced sensory anticipation in migraine.
    Mulder EJ; Linssen WH; de Geus EI
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Mar; 39(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 12212665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
    Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capture of attention in selective frequency listening.
    Green TJ; McKeown JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 11642703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of visual, auditory, and mixed cues on choice reaction in Parkinson's disease.
    Akamatsu T; Fukuyama H; Kawamata T
    J Neurol Sci; 2008 Jun; 269(1-2):118-25. PubMed ID: 18279895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effective time course of preparation.
    Los SA; Schut ML
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Aug; 57(1):20-55. PubMed ID: 18255052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The immediate effect of attentional, auditory, and a combined cue strategy on gait during single and dual tasks in Parkinson's disease.
    Baker K; Rochester L; Nieuwboer A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 88(12):1593-600. PubMed ID: 18047873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds.
    Gregg MK; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention.
    Ho C; Spence C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2005 Sep; 11(3):157-74. PubMed ID: 16221035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fear-conditioned cues of impending pain facilitate attentional engagement.
    Van Damme S; Lorenz J; Eccleston C; Koster EH; De Clercq A; Crombez G
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2004 Feb; 34(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15030798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Helton WS; Head J; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 21287153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sound increases the saliency of visual events.
    Noesselt T; Bergmann D; Hake M; Heinze HJ; Fendrich R
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():157-63. PubMed ID: 18234167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.