These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15141926)

  • 41. Using peripersonal warning signals to orient a driver's gaze.
    Ho C; Spence C
    Hum Factors; 2009 Aug; 51(4):539-56. PubMed ID: 19899363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Abnormal externally guided movement preparation in recent-onset schizophrenia is associated with impaired selective attention to external input.
    Smid HG; Westenbroek JM; Bruggeman R; Knegtering H; Van den Bosch RJ
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Nov; 170(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 19762086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Signal evaluation environment: a new method for the design of peripheral in-vehicle warning signals.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Jun; 43(2):537-47. PubMed ID: 21298566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Transient and sustained effects of an auditory accessory stimulus in a visual go/no go task.
    Nakano Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Oct; 95(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 12434856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Interhemispheric functional relationships in the process of "motor command" preparation during choice responses].
    Kostandov EA; Zakharova NN; Pogrebinskiĭ SA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1981; 31(6):1123-30. PubMed ID: 7331500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Modulation of auditory stimulus processing by visual spatial or temporal cue: an event-related potentials study.
    Tang X; Li C; Li Q; Gao Y; Yang W; Yang J; Ishikawa S; Wu J
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Oct; 553():40-5. PubMed ID: 23896527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amplitude-modulated auditory stimuli influence selection of visual spatial frequencies.
    Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23589802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Gardini S; Mascetti GG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):297-324. PubMed ID: 14742178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. No evidence for a cue mismatch in negative priming.
    Mayr S; Hauke R; Buchner A; Niedeggen M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):645-52. PubMed ID: 19123117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are the warning icons more attentional?
    Tao J; Yafeng N; Lei Z
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():51-60. PubMed ID: 28802460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Performance characteristics of field dependent and independent individuals on an auditory signal detection task.
    DeFazio VJ; Moroney WF
    J Psychol; 1969 Jan; 71(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 5779892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The warning glove - development and evaluation of a multimodal action-specific warning prototype.
    Schmuntzsch U; Sturm C; Roetting M
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Sep; 45(5):1297-305. PubMed ID: 24119868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Filling the preparatory interval with temporal information or visual noise: crossover effect in schizophrenics and controls.
    Borst U; Cohen R
    Psychol Med; 1989 Nov; 19(4):865-74. PubMed ID: 2594883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differential redundancy gain in onset detection versus offset detection.
    Fischer R; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Apr; 70(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 18459253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 2007 Jan; 71(1):42-63. PubMed ID: 16341545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cue timing in a multi-dimensional detection task.
    Forbes SM; Taylor MM; Lindsay PH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Aug; 25(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 6077960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disorders of the anterior attentional-intentional system in patients with end stage renal disease: Evidence from reaction time studies.
    Harciarek M; Michałowski J; Biedunkiewicz B; Williamson J; Dębska-Ślizień A; Rutkowski B; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Aug; 107():1-9. PubMed ID: 27363003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of age, brain damage, and task complexity on the sensitivity of reaction time to the delay between the warning signal and the stimulus.
    Bruyer R; Coyette F; Wyns C
    Int J Neurosci; 1989 Nov; 49(1-2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2606609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.