BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15142097)

  • 1. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants.
    Hatano N; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 15142097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
    Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years.
    Zijderveld SA; Schulten EA; Aartman IH; ten Bruggenkate CM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):691-700. PubMed ID: 19453567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement.
    Tawil G; Mawla M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):713-21. PubMed ID: 11669254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovine-derived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study.
    Lutz R; Berger-Fink S; Stockmann P; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Jun; 26(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 25906198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings.
    Cordioli G; Mazzocco C; Schepers E; Brugnolo E; Majzoub Z
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):270-8. PubMed ID: 11359485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary sinus augmentation with the xenograft Bio-Oss and autogenous intraoral bone for qualitative improvement of the implant site: a histologic and histomorphometric clinical study in humans.
    Yildirim M; Spiekermann H; Handt S; Edelhoff D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11280359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scintigraphic, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses of bovine bone mineral and autogenous bone mixture in sinus floor augmentation: a randomized controlled trial--results after 4 months of healing.
    Pikdöken L; Gürbüzer B; Küçükodacı Z; Urhan M; Barış E; Tezulaş E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 21050644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
    Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on sinus lifting: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Torres J; Tamimi F; Martinez PP; Alkhraisat MH; Linares R; Hernández G; Torres-Macho J; López-Cabarcos E
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 19563329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
    Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts.
    Zijderveld SA; Zerbo IR; van den Bergh JP; Schulten EA; ten Bruggenkate CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 15973955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical and radiographic outcomes of delayed implant placements after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials].
    Zhang X; Sun F; Zhang F; Zhang ZY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 47(10):584-7. PubMed ID: 23302379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
    Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
    Karabuda C; Ozdemir O; Tosun T; Anil A; Olgaç V
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
    Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone resorption around dental implants placed in grafted sinuses: clinical and radiologic follow-up after up to 4 years.
    Maiorana C; Sigurtà D; Mirandola A; Garlini G; Santoro F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 15839120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 79.