689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15143092)
1. Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.
Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Brezden-Masley C; Dent R; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1993-9. PubMed ID: 15143092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the quality of abstract reporting for phase I cancer trials.
Strevel EL; Chau NG; Pond GR; Murgo AJ; Ivy PS; Siu LL
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Mar; 14(6):1782-7. PubMed ID: 18347180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting quality and information consistency of randomized, controlled trials presented as abstracts at the American Urological Association annual meetings.
Turpen RM; Fesperman SF; Smith WA; Vieweg J; Dahm P
J Urol; 2010 Jul; 184(1):249-53. PubMed ID: 20483151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical power of negative randomized controlled trials presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
Bedard PL; Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3482-7. PubMed ID: 17687153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consistency of phase III clinical trial abstracts presented at an annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology compared with their subsequent full-text publications.
Tam VC; Hotte SJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 May; 26(13):2205-11. PubMed ID: 18445846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported?
Duan Y; Li J; Ai C; Chen Y; Chen P; Zhang M; Hopewell S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 19845978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved.
Hopewell S; Clarke M; Askie L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):681-4. PubMed ID: 16765270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Publication rate of abstracts from the annual ASTRO meeting: comparison with other organizations.
Papagikos MA; Rossi PJ; Lee WR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 17411764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Presentation of nonfinal results of randomized controlled trials at major oncology meetings.
Booth CM; Le Maître A; Ding K; Farn K; Fralick M; Phillips C; Cescon DW; Meyer RM
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(24):3938-44. PubMed ID: 19620490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?
Cui Q; Tian J; Song X; Yang K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):827-33. PubMed ID: 24916891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequacy of published oncology randomized controlled trials to provide therapeutic details needed for clinical application.
Duff JM; Leather H; Walden EO; LaPlant KD; George TJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):702-5. PubMed ID: 20410466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Presentation and subsequent publication rates of phase I oncology clinical trials.
Camacho LH; Bacik J; Cheung A; Spriggs DR
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 104(7):1497-504. PubMed ID: 16116590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
Parent N; Hanley JA
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.
Lai TY; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS; Leung GM
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(6):390-8. PubMed ID: 18161613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting quality of conference abstracts on randomised controlled trials in gerontology and geriatrics: a cross-sectional investigation.
Mann E; Meyer G
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 21843850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized clinical trials behind level A recommendations in obstetric practice bulletins: compliance with CONSORT statement.
Chauhan SP; Berghella V; Sanderson M; Siddiqui D; Hendrix NW; Magann EF
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 18979412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
