397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15145874)
1. Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK; Andersen HR
Heart; 2004 Jun; 90(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 15145874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
Nielsen JC; Kristensen L; Andersen HR; Mortensen PT; Pedersen OL; Pedersen AK
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(4):614-23. PubMed ID: 12932590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Vesterlund T; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Eur Heart J; 2011 Mar; 32(6):686-96. PubMed ID: 21300730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
Mutagaywa RK; Tumaini B; Chin A
Cardiovasc J Afr; 2021 Jan-Feb 23; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single lead atrial vs. dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome: extended register-based follow-up in the DANPACE trial.
Brandt NH; Kirkfeldt RE; Nielsen JC; Mortensen LS; Jensen GVH; Johansen JB; Haugan K
Europace; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 28039212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial thromboembolism in patients with sick sinus syndrome: prediction from pacing mode, atrial fibrillation, and echocardiographic findings.
Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T
Heart; 1999 Apr; 81(4):412-8. PubMed ID: 10092569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and efficacy of AAIR pacing in selected patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Senaratne J; Herath TT; Beaudette D; Irwin M; Gulamhusein S; Senaratne MP
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(42):e12833. PubMed ID: 30334983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective Management of Atrioventricular Interval for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation That Developed After DDDR Pacemaker Implantation in a Sick Sinus Syndrome Patient.
Tasaki H; Ashizawa N; Nagao S; Fukushima K; Furukawa R; Fukae S; Maemura K
Int Heart J; 2015; 56(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 26370366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Incidence and risk indicators of thromboembolism during the acute phase of single chamber ventricular pacing].
Hayashi Y; Ikeda U; Asai Y; Shimada K
J Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 42(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 14526659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
Boriani G; Pieragnoli P; Botto GL; Puererfellner H; Mont L; Ziacchi M; Manolis AS; Gulizia M; Tukkie R; Landolina M; Ricciardi G; Cicconelli M; Grammatico A; Biffi M
Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of consistent atrial pacing algorithm on premature atrial complexe number and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrences in brady-tachy syndrome: a randomized prospective cross over study.
Ricci R; Santini M; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Capucci A; Pignalberi C; Boriani G; Botto GL; Spampinato A; Bellocci F; Proclemer A; Grammatico A; de Seta F
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 5(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11248773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrial fibrillation in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the association with PQ-interval and percentage of ventricular pacing.
Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Højberg S; Møller M; Riahi S; Dalsgaard D; Mortensen LS; Nielsen T; Asklund M; Friis EV; Christensen PD; Simonsen EH; Eriksen UH; Jensen GV; Svendsen JH; Toff WD; Healey JS; Andersen HR;
Europace; 2012 May; 14(5):682-9. PubMed ID: 22106360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of atrioventricular asynchrony on platelet activation: implication of thromboembolism in paced patients.
Lau CP; Tse HF; Cheng G
Heart; 1997 Oct; 78(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 9404251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome.
Andersen HR; Nielsen JC; Thomsen PE; Thuesen L; Mortensen PT; Vesterlund T; Pedersen AK
Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9086):1210-6. PubMed ID: 9652562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ventricular function in atrial rate adaptive versus dual chamber rate adaptive pacing during exercise.
Gallik DM; Guidry GW; Mahmarian JJ; Verani MS; Spencer WH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 7513403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAIR pacemaker.
Kristensen L; Nielsen JC; Pedersen AK; Mortensen PT; Andersen HR
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Mar; 24(3):358-65. PubMed ID: 11310306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
