90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15146492)
1. Molecular modeling of protein function regions.
DeWeese-Scott C; Moult J
Proteins; 2004 Jun; 55(4):942-61. PubMed ID: 15146492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELLER.
Sali A; Potterton L; Yuan F; van Vlijmen H; Karplus M
Proteins; 1995 Nov; 23(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 8710825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
Najmanovich R; Kurbatova N; Thornton J
Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i105-11. PubMed ID: 18689810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Domain-based small molecule binding site annotation.
Snyder KA; Feldman HJ; Dumontier M; Salama JJ; Hogue CW
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():152. PubMed ID: 16545112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of six protein structures predicted by comparative modeling techniques.
Harrison RW; Chatterjee D; Weber IT
Proteins; 1995 Dec; 23(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 8749843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction.
Moult J
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Jun; 15(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 15939584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confronting the problem of interconnected structural changes in the comparative modeling of proteins.
Samudrala R; Pedersen JT; Zhou HB; Luo R; Fidelis K; Moult J
Proteins; 1995 Nov; 23(3):327-36. PubMed ID: 8710826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicted role for the archease protein family based on structural and sequence analysis of TM1083 and MTH1598, two proteins structurally characterized through structural genomics efforts.
Canaves JM
Proteins; 2004 Jul; 56(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15162483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of the druggable concavity in homology models using the PLB index.
Soga S; Shirai H; Kobori M; Hirayama N
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2287-92. PubMed ID: 17935312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis, identification and correction of some errors of model refseqs appeared in NCBI Human Gene Database by in silico cloning and experimental verification of novel human genes].
Zhang DL; Ji L; Li YD
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 May; 31(5):431-43. PubMed ID: 15478601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protein structure prediction based on sequence similarity.
Jaroszewski L
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 569():129-56. PubMed ID: 19623489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing model accuracy using the homology modeling automatically software.
Bhattacharya A; Wunderlich Z; Monleon D; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2008 Jan; 70(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 17640066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models.
Cozzetto D; Tramontano A
Proteins; 2005 Jan; 58(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 15495137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consensus adaptation of fields for molecular comparison (AFMoC) models incorporate ligand and receptor conformational variability into tailor-made scoring functions.
Breu B; Silber K; Gohlke H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2383-400. PubMed ID: 17958410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structure modeling, ligand binding, and binding affinity calculation (LR-MM-PBSA) of human heparanase for inhibition and drug design.
Zhou Z; Bates M; Madura JD
Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):580-92. PubMed ID: 16972282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction.
Ginalski K
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Apr; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16510277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dopamine transporter comparative molecular modeling and binding site prediction using the LeuT(Aa) leucine transporter as a template.
Indarte M; Madura JD; Surratt CK
Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):1033-46. PubMed ID: 17847094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pheromone binding to two rodent urinary proteins revealed by X-ray crystallography.
Böcskei Z; Groom CR; Flower DR; Wright CE; Phillips SE; Cavaggioni A; Findlay JB; North AC
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6400):186-8. PubMed ID: 1279439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships.
Gold ND; Jackson RM
J Mol Biol; 2006 Feb; 355(5):1112-24. PubMed ID: 16359705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
Geromichalos GD
J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
