90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1514713)
1. Double-blind comparison of the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic effects of sodium meglumine ioxaglate or iohexol during diagnostic cardiac catheterization.
Petersen R; McKay CR; Kawanishi DT; Kotlewski A; Parise K; Niland JC
Angiology; 1992 Sep; 43(9):765-80. PubMed ID: 1514713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
Cooper MW; Reed PJ
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ
Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of iodixanol (Visipaque) and ioxaglate (Hexabrix) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a double-blind randomized study].
Roriz R; de Gevigney G; Finet G; Nantois-Collet C; Borch KW; Amiel M; Beaune J
J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 80(7):727-32. PubMed ID: 10431273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are ioxaglate and iopamidol equally safe and well tolerated in cardiac angiography? A randomized, double-blind clinical study.
Piscione F; Focaccio A; Santinelli V; De Paola M; Villari B; Spinazzi A; Condorelli M; Chiariello M
Am Heart J; 1990 Nov; 120(5):1130-6. PubMed ID: 2239665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sodium addition to nonionic contrast media. Effects on cardiac monophasic action potentials and hemodynamics in a dog model.
Jacobsen EA; Kløw NE; Mortensen E; Refsum H
Invest Radiol; 1991 Oct; 26(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 1960031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the temperature of contrast media on cardiac electrophysiology and hemodynamics during coronary arteriography.
Jacobsen EA; Mortensen E; Refsum H; Kløw NE
Invest Radiol; 1992 Nov; 27(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 1464514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: comparison with diatrizoate.
Hirshfeld JW; Laskey W; Martin JL; Groh WC; Untereker W; Wolf GL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):954-7. PubMed ID: 6630771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of sodium on hemodynamic changes during coronary angiography with nonionic contrast media.
Piao ZE; Hwang MH; Murdock DK; Sheu SH; Loeb HS; Scanlon PJ
J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Dec; 116(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 2246555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during coronary arteriography before and after acute left ventricular failure in dogs. A comparison between iodixanol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
Kløw NE; Mortensen E; Refsum H
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 2031795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H
Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between a low-osmolar ionic (ioxaglate) and a low-osmolar non-ionic (iopamidol) contrast agent in cardiac imaging.
Scholtz ME; Svatos VJ; Myburgh DP
S Afr Med J; 1988 Feb; 73(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 3340942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of ventricular fibrillation during coronary arteriography in the rabbit. A comparative study of isotonic ioxaglate and iohexol.
Donadieu AM; Hartl C; Cardinal A; Bonnemain B
Invest Radiol; 1987 Feb; 22(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 3557882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
