90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1514713)
21. Effects of contrast media on the RR and QT interval during coronary arteriography.
Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Soga T; Maeda M; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Misaki T; Dokoh S
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2031794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study.
Salem DN; Konstam MA; Isner JM; Bonin JD
Am Heart J; 1986 Mar; 111(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 3006464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of contrast media on myocardial function during acute left ventricular failure in the dog.
Kløw NE; Hevrøy O; Dale K; Mjøs OD
Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2298549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function.
Bergstra A; van Dijk RB; Brekke O; Buurma AE; Orozco L; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2000 Jul; 50(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 10878628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic consequences of high- and low-osmolality contrast agents for left ventricular angiography.
Vik-Mo H; Rosland GA; Følling M; Danielsen R
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 3383235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comparison of the tolerance of ionic and nonionic contrast media in coronary angiography].
Savchenko AP; Frolova MI; Pavlov NA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1993; (6):21-4. PubMed ID: 7801591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multicenter randomized trial of ionic (ioxaglate) and nonionic (iopamidol) low-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography.
Klinke WP; Grace M; Miller R; Naqvi SZ; Roth D; Roy L
Clin Cardiol; 1989 Dec; 12(12):689-96. PubMed ID: 2692891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Iotrolan 320 and Iohexol 350 in cardiac angiography: a randomised double-blind clinical study.
Mezilis N; Salame MY; Dyet JF; Arafa SO; Oakley GD; Cumberland DC
Eur J Radiol; 1998 Sep; 28(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 9788025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Addition of sodium to the nonionic contrast medium iohexol during coronary angiography in man. Lack of electrocardiographic or hemodynamic effects.
Vik-Mo H; Bjørkhaug A; Danielsen R; Følling M; Kloster Y; Skinningsrud K
Acta Radiol; 1992 Sep; 33(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 1389661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Effects of contrast media on left ventricular function. Comparison with iohexol and diatrizoate].
Kato N; Yamakado T; Hayashi T; Ohkubo S; Murayama S; Hamada M; Nakano T
Kokyu To Junkan; 1990 Jun; 38(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 2377825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of low osmolar contrast agents during coronary angiography in the dog and the rabbit.
Doucet D; Idée JM; Donadieu AM; Bonnemain B
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2742326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Aortic and pulmonary arterial pressure after injection of contrast media into the right atrium of the rabbit. Comparison between metrizoate, ioxaglate and iohexol.
Almén T; Aspelin P; Nilsson P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():37-41. PubMed ID: 6267891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of ioversol during cardiac angiography. Comparison with iopamidol and diatrizoate.
Hirshfeld JW; Wieland J; Davis CA; Giles BD; Passione D; Ray MB; Ripley NS
Invest Radiol; 1989 Feb; 24(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 2645244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
Murdock CJ; Davis MJ; Ireland MA; Gibbons FA; Cope GD
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Hemodynamic effects of non-ionic iomeprol 350 and ionic diatrizoate 370 during levocardiography and coronary angiography--double-blind randomized comparison of 2 contrast media].
Lins M; Röhling D; Zahorsky R; Höfig M; Herrmann G; Simon R
Z Kardiol; 1994 Sep; 83(9):626-33. PubMed ID: 7801664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative trial of Omnipaque 350 (iohexol) and Telebrix 350 (sodium-meglumine-ioxithalamate) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
Jorgova J; Sedney MI; van der Wall EE; van Benthem A; Buis B
Eur J Radiol; 1992; 15(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1396796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coronary angiography during acute myocardial infarction in dogs: comparison of the hemodynamic effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Gries W; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
J Lab Clin Med; 1988 Sep; 112(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 3411193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Repeated intracoronary injections of contrast media. Additive hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects in a dog model.
Jacobsen EA; Kløw NE; Pedersen HK; Refsum H
Invest Radiol; 1993 Oct; 28(10):917-24. PubMed ID: 8262746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
