These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15147394)

  • 1. Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage.
    Sherman GB; Kachman SD; Hungerford LL; Rupp GP; Fox CP; Brown MD; Feuz BM; Holm TR
    Anim Genet; 2004 Jun; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 15147394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The value of DNA paternity identification in beef cattle: examples from Nevada's free-range ranches.
    Gomez-Raya L; Priest K; Rauw WM; Okomo-Adhiambo M; Thain D; Bruce B; Rink A; Torell R; Grellman L; Narayanan R; Beattie CW
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 17878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data.
    Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Apr; 94(4):2114-7. PubMed ID: 21427003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of pastoralists' memory-based kinship assignment of Ankole cattle: a microsatellite DNA analysis.
    Kugonza DR; Kiwuwa GH; Mpairwe D; Jianlin H; Nabasirye M; Okeyo AM; Hanotte O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22225582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations.
    Kirst M; Cordeiro CM; Rezende GD; Grattapaglia D
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 15601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parentage and relatedness in captive and natural populations of the Roseate Spoonbill (Aves: Ciconiiformes) based on microsatellite data.
    Miño CI; Sawyer GM; Benjamin RC; Del Lama SN
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2009 Jul; 311(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 19424995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
    Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Establishment of paternity testing system using microsatellite markers in Chinese Holstein.
    Tian F; Sun D; Zhang Y
    J Genet Genomics; 2008 May; 35(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 18499071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wrong and missing sire information affects genetic gain in the Angeln dairy cattle population.
    Sanders K; Bennewitz J; Kalm E
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Jan; 89(1):315-21. PubMed ID: 16357295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimations of the efficacy and reliability of paternity assignments from DNA microsatellite analysis of multiple-sire matings.
    Vankan DM; Faddy MJ
    Anim Genet; 1999 Oct; 30(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 10582280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A bayesian framework for parentage analysis: the value of genetic and other biological data.
    Neff BD; Repka J; Gross MR
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Jun; 59(4):315-31. PubMed ID: 11560451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parentage verification in field progeny testing program of Mehsana buffalo.
    Jakhesara SJ; Rank DN; Kansara JD; Parikh RC; Patel VM; Vataliya PH; Solanki JV
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4723-8. PubMed ID: 22851245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A case of multiple assignments (paternity/maternity) in an equine-out breeding system.
    Castagnasso EE; Kienast ME; García PP; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):889-90. PubMed ID: 17524055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The number of single nucleotide polymorphisms and on-farm data required for whole-herd parentage testing in dairy cattle herds.
    Fisher PJ; Malthus B; Walker MC; Corbett G; Spelman RJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):369-74. PubMed ID: 19109294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assignment of paternity in a judicial dispute between two neighbor Holstein dairy farmers.
    Lirón JP; Ripoli MV; García PP; Giovambattista G
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 14979351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multilocus heterozygosity, parental relatedness and individual fitness components in a wild mountain goat, Oreamnos americanus population.
    Mainguy J; Côté SD; Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2297-306. PubMed ID: 19389162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.