These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15147618)

  • 21. Quality standards and certification requirements for mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule; opportunity for public comment.
    Fed Regist; 1994 Sep; 59(189):49808-13. PubMed ID: 10137648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MQSA helps eliminate inferior mammography.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Nov; 19(11):129-32, 136. PubMed ID: 10176114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1997 Oct; 62(208):55852-994. PubMed ID: 10177306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
    Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
    Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
    Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
    Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on the availability of mammography facilities.
    Fischer R; Houn F; Van De Griek A; Tucker SA; Meyers D; Murphy M; Unis G
    Prev Med; 1998; 27(5 Pt 1):697-701. PubMed ID: 9808801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D; Posedel D; Stimac D; Ivezic Z; Kasabasic M; Ivkovic A; Kubelka D; Ilakovac V; Brnic Z; Bjelac OC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 1998 Mammography Quality Standards Act final rule: summary of new requirements.
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1997 Dec; 16(16):17-8. PubMed ID: 10187283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Mammography Quality Standards Act and interventional mammography procedures.
    Houn F; Finder C
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 Mar; 82(3):14-7. PubMed ID: 10166189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mammography screening: technology, radiation dose and risk, quality control, and benefits to society. A symposium conducted during the scientific assembly and annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, December 1988. Proceedings.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):627-56. PubMed ID: 2305042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimum quality standards for mammography facilities.
    Hoppszallern S
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Mar; 13(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10135179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992: history and process.
    Houn F; Franke KA; Elliott ML; Finder CA; Burkhart RL; Fischer R
    Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 10343015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The status of film/screen mammography. Results of the BENT study.
    Jans RG; Butler PF; McCrohan JL; Thompson WE
    Radiology; 1979 Jul; 132(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 451199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Medical physicists role under MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act).
    Haus AG
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Nov; 13(11):35-8. PubMed ID: 10139208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.