These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15147930)

  • 1. Spatial categories and the estimation of location.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Corrigan B; Crawford LE
    Cognition; 2004 Sep; 93(2):75-97. PubMed ID: 15147930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in spatial memory: a categorical endorsement.
    Haun DB; Allen GL; Wedell DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):149-70. PubMed ID: 15627414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children use categories to maximize accuracy in estimation.
    Duffy S; Huttenlocher J; Crawford LE
    Dev Sci; 2006 Nov; 9(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 17059457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes.
    Holden MP; Curby KM; Newcombe NS; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):590-604. PubMed ID: 20438259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Location memory for dots in polygons versus cities in regions: evaluating the category adjustment model.
    Friedman A; Montello DR; Burte H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1336-51. PubMed ID: 22545606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding developmental changes in the stability and flexibility of spatial categories based on object relatedness.
    Hund AM; Foster EK
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):218-32. PubMed ID: 18194020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: a retrieval model.
    Sampaio C; Wang RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1331-7. PubMed ID: 19686025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.
    Meienbrock A; Naumer MJ; Doehrmann O; Singer W; Muckli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 16797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
    Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of categories and spatial cuing in global-scale location estimates.
    Friedman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 19210083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian average or truncation at boundaries? The mechanisms underlying categorical bias in spatial memory.
    Sampaio C; Wang RF
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):473-484. PubMed ID: 30560470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stability and flexibility of spatial categories.
    Hund AM; Plumert JM
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Feb; 50(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 15556128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial scaling of the binocular capture effect.
    Raghunandan A; Anderson CS; Saladin JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 19182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.
    Prinzmetal W; McCool C; Park S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):73-92. PubMed ID: 15702964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
    Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory for locations within regions: spatial biases and visual hemifield differences.
    Laeng B; Peters M; McCabe B
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jan; 26(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 9519700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.