These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15148187)

  • 21. Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.
    Brendel M; Buechner A; Krueger B; Frohne-Buechner C; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18223447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.
    Dawson PW; Vandali AE; Knight MR; Heasman JM
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 17496668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Loiselle LH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 17496675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of FM-receiver gain on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Wolfe J; Lawless T; Stout B
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 19363720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.
    Skinner MW; Clark GM; Whitford LA; Seligman PM; Staller SJ; Shipp DB; Shallop JK; Everingham C; Menapace CM; Arndt PL
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15 Suppl 2():15-27. PubMed ID: 8572106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; Heldner B; Mülder H; Ward E; Vincent B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(7):409-21. PubMed ID: 19928395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of Veterans Affairs cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen NL; Waltzman SB; Roland JT; Bromberg B; Cambron N; Gibbs L; Parkinson W; Snead C
    Am J Otol; 1997 Jul; 18(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 9233486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Companding to improve cochlear-implant speech recognition in speech-shaped noise.
    Bhattacharya A; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1079-89. PubMed ID: 17672655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
    Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
    Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of front-end processing on cochlear implant performance of children.
    Wolfe J; Schafer EC; John A; Hudson M
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21436756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of input processing and type of personal frequency modulation system on speech-recognition performance of adults with cochlear implants.
    Wolfe J; Schafer E; Parkinson A; John A; Hudson M; Wheeler J; Mucci A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22941405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.