These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15148951)
1. Carl Cohen's 'kind' arguments for animal rights and against human rights. Nobis N J Appl Philos; 2004; 21(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 15148951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respect for people and animals. Markie PJ J Value Inq; 2004; 38(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 16395836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The simple dignity of sentient life: speciesism and human dignity. Meyer M J Soc Philos; 2001; 32(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 16035159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal cases and moral relevance. Bernstein M J Soc Philos; 2002; 33(4):523-39. PubMed ID: 16619461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioethical troubles: animal individuals and human organisms. Donnelley S Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(7; Spec. Iss):21-9. PubMed ID: 11653193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A dialogue on species-specific rights: humans and animals in bioethics. Thomasma DC; Loewy EH Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1997; 6(4):435-44; discussion 445-8. PubMed ID: 9292219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Killing for knowledge. Zamir T J Appl Philos; 2006; 23(1):17-40. PubMed ID: 16683324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights? Beauchamp TL Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11655126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Against "humanism": speciesism, personhood, and preference. Cushing S J Soc Philos; 2003; 34(4):556-71. PubMed ID: 16619458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Do animals have rights? Cohen C Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 11655133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The failure of theories of personhood. Beauchamp TL Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Dec; 9(4):309-24. PubMed ID: 11657914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinctive moralities: the value of life and our duties to the handicapped. Ramsay H J Value Inq; 1998 Dec; 32(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 15295853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The harmful, nontherapeutic use of animals in research is morally wrong. Nobis N Am J Med Sci; 2011 Oct; 342(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 21952174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights, justice, and duties to provide assistance: a critique of Regan's theory of rights. Jamieson D Ethics; 1990 Jan; 100(2):349-62. PubMed ID: 11659234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rights of humans and other animals. Regan T Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 11655125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical considerations in painful animal research. Fox MA Adv Pain Res Ther; 1985; 9():685-94. PubMed ID: 11659068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The question is not, "can they talk"? Namkoong G; Regan T J Med Philos; 1988 May; 13(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 3418249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Animal welfare and individual characteristics: a conversation against speciesism. Bekoff M; Gruen L Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 11652252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]