137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15149413)
1. Nonlinear relationships and phylogenetically independent contrasts.
Quader S; Isvaran K; Hale RE; Miner BG; Seavy NE
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 15149413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phylogeny, regression, and the allometry of physiological traits.
O'Connor MP; Agosta SJ; Hansen F; Kemp SJ; Sieg AE; McNair JN; Dunham AE
Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 17879193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.
Price T
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1997 Apr; 352(1352):519-29. PubMed ID: 9163825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing the genetic constraint hypothesis in a phylogenetic context: a simulation study.
Revell LJ
Evolution; 2007 Nov; 61(11):2720-7. PubMed ID: 17927779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phylogenetic signal in bone microstructure of sauropsids.
Cubo J; Ponton F; Laurin M; de Margerie E; Castanet J
Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):562-74. PubMed ID: 16085575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology.
Garland T; Bennett AF; Rezende EL
J Exp Biol; 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3015-35. PubMed ID: 16081601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identical inferences about correlated evolution arise from ancestral state reconstruction and independent contrasts.
Elliot MG
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 364():321-5. PubMed ID: 25280935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Putting phylogeny into the analysis of biological traits: a methodological approach.
Jombart T; Pavoine S; Devillard S; Pontier D
J Theor Biol; 2010 Jun; 264(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 20361983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncorrelated evolution between vocal and plumage coloration traits in the trogons: a comparative study.
Ornelas JF; González C; Espinosa de los Monteros A
J Evol Biol; 2009 Mar; 22(3):471-84. PubMed ID: 19210590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calculating independent contrasts for the comparative study of substitution rates.
Welch JJ; Waxman D
J Theor Biol; 2008 Apr; 251(4):667-78. PubMed ID: 18249413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
Symonds MR
Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A phylogenetic analysis of the allometry of diving.
Halsey LG; Butler PJ; Blackburn TM
Am Nat; 2006 Feb; 167(2):276-87. PubMed ID: 16670986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies.
Harmon LJ; Losos JB
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2705-10. PubMed ID: 16526516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.
Griffin RH; Yapuncich GS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144147. PubMed ID: 26683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relating traits to diversification: a simple test.
Freckleton RP; Phillimore AB; Pagel M
Am Nat; 2008 Jul; 172(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 18505385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds.
Pitcher TE; Dunn PO; Whittingham LA
J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):557-67. PubMed ID: 15842485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
Felsenstein J
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evolution of yolk androgens in birds: development, coloniality, and sexual dichromatism.
Gil D; Biard C; Lacroix A; Spottiswoode CN; Saino N; Puerta M; Moller AP
Am Nat; 2007 Jun; 169(6):802-19. PubMed ID: 17479466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses.
Harmon LJ; Glor RE
Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):2173-8. PubMed ID: 20163450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
