These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15150636)

  • 1. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations.
    Ermis RB; Aydin U
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the dental structure loss produced during maintenance and replacement of occlusal amalgam restorations.
    Sardenberg F; Bonifácio CC; Braga MM; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(3):242-6. PubMed ID: 18949310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Student and faculty perceptions in the assessment of amalgam restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2000; 80(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 11324025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An update on the reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorations.
    Eltahlah D; Lynch CD; Chadwick BL; Blum IR; Wilson NHF
    J Dent; 2018 May; 72():1-7. PubMed ID: 29522787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan.
    Al Negrish AR
    Int Dent J; 2001 Apr; 51(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 11569662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school.
    Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations.
    Deligeorgi V; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Prim Dent Care; 2001 Jan; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11405031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimum bitewing examination recall intervals assessed by computer simulation.
    Moles DR; Downer MC
    Community Dent Health; 2000 Mar; 17(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11039625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH
    Tex Dent J; 2014 Jul; 131(7):520-8. PubMed ID: 25265686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Heaven TJ; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Fellows JL; Brad Rindal D; Firestone AR; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):718-25. PubMed ID: 23743181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Variations among dentists in the diagnosis of caries and assessment of dental restorations].
    Poorterman JH; Verheij JG; Kieft JA; Eijkman MA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Jun; 104(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11923916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial.
    Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson NH; Burke FJ; Mjör IA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10332373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany.
    Friedl KH; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(6):228-32. PubMed ID: 9028243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Underestimation of the prevalence of approximal caries and inadequate restorations in a clinical epidemiological study.
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kalsbeek H
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 10503793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.