BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15150639)

  • 1. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) on healing bone defects: a histological study in rabbits.
    Aslan M; Simsek G; Dayi E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 15150639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of a new bioresorbable film to guided bone regeneration in tibia defect model of the rabbits.
    He H; Huang J; Chen G; Dong Y
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jul; 82(1):256-62. PubMed ID: 17311317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs.
    Jung RE; Lecloux G; Rompen E; Ramel CF; Buser D; Hammerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 19191792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Lee SH; Yoon HJ; Park MK; Kim YS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 19216278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
    Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of guided tissue regeneration on the healing of osseous defects in rat calvaria.
    Bohning BP; Davenport WD; Jeansonne BG
    J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 10204461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone healing following the use of hydroxyapatite or ionomeric bone substitutes alone or combined with a guided bone regeneration technique: an animal study.
    Salata LA; Craig GT; Brook IM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 9509779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barrier membranes on bone augmentation in rabbit calvaria.
    Ito K; Nanba K; Murai S
    J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1229-37. PubMed ID: 9848532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of an in situ formed synthetic hydrogel as a biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration.
    Jung RE; Zwahlen R; Weber FE; Molenberg A; van Lenthe GH; Hammerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Aug; 17(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 16907774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of human hypertrophic chondrocytes-derived extracellular matrix for the treatment of critical-size calvarial defects.
    Donos N; Graziani F; Mardas N; Kostopoulos L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1346-53. PubMed ID: 21382090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blood-filled spaces with and without deproteinized bone grafts in guided bone regeneration. A histomorphometric study of the rabbit skull using non-resorbable membrane.
    Okazaki K; Shimizu Y; Xu H; Ooya K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 15777334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceleration of de novo bone formation with a novel bioabsorbable film: a histomorphometric study in vivo.
    He H; Yan W; Chen G; Lu Z
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2008 Jul; 37(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 18355176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acellular dermal matrix as a barrier in guided bone regeneration: a clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Borges GJ; Novaes AB; Grisi MF; Palioto DB; Taba M; de Souza SL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1105-15. PubMed ID: 19519803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Histologic evaluation of the osteoinductive property of autogenous demineralized dentin matrix on surgical bone defects in rabbit skulls using human amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration.
    Gomes MF; dos Anjos MJ; Nogueira TO; Guimarães SA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 11516004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closure of palatal defects without a surgical flap: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Al Ruhaimi KA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 59(11):1319-25. PubMed ID: 11688036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled release of fibroblast growth factor 2 stimulates bone healing in an animal model of diabetes mellitus.
    Santana RB; Trackman PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 17066631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of cortical bone perforation on experimental guided bone regeneration.
    Nishimura I; Shimizu Y; Ooya K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Jun; 15(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15142091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs.
    Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Herten M; Wüstefeld M; Sager M; Ferrari D; Becker J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 18324961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental observation of origins of osteoblasts in guided bone regeneration in long bone].
    Zhang Y; Lu S; Wang J; Zhang B; Xie Y
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb; 37(2):123-5, 6. PubMed ID: 11829801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.