BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15150715)

  • 1. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials.
    Dromerick AW; Edwards DF; Diringer MN
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15150715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the cut-off score for the Modified Barthel Index and the Modified Rankin Scale for assessment of functional independence and residual disability after stroke.
    Lee SY; Kim DY; Sohn MK; Lee J; Lee SG; Shin YI; Kim SY; Oh GJ; Lee YH; Lee YS; Joo MC; Lee SY; Ahn J; Chang WH; Choi JY; Kang SH; Kim IY; Han J; Kim YH
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226324. PubMed ID: 31995563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors enhancing activities of daily living after stroke in specialized rehabilitation: an observational multicenter study within the Sunnaas International Network.
    Langhammer B; Sunnerhagen KS; Lundgren-Nilsson Å; Sällström S; Becker F; Stanghelle JK
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Oct; 53(5):725-734. PubMed ID: 28417611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.
    van der Putten JJ; Hobart JC; Freeman JA; Thompson AJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1999 Apr; 66(4):480-4. PubMed ID: 10201420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure as outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: patterns of disability scale usage in clinical trials.
    Sangha H; Lipson D; Foley N; Salter K; Bhogal S; Pohani G; Teasell RW
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2005 Jun; 28(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 15900183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel index and the modified Rankin scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials.
    Uyttenboogaart M; Stewart RE; Vroomen PC; De Keyser J; Luijckx GJ
    Stroke; 2005 Sep; 36(9):1984-7. PubMed ID: 16081854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale.
    Kwon S; Hartzema AG; Duncan PW; Min-Lai S
    Stroke; 2004 Apr; 35(4):918-23. PubMed ID: 14976324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application.
    Quinn TJ; Langhorne P; Stott DJ
    Stroke; 2011 Apr; 42(4):1146-51. PubMed ID: 21372310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical scales for measuring stroke rehabilitation promote functional recovery by supporting teamwork.
    Bartolo M; Zucchella C; Tortola P; Spicciato F; Sandrini G; Pierelli F
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 52(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 25573601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional Independence and Disability Evaluation in Stroke Patients: Optimal Cutoff Scores for a Pictorial-Based Longshi Scale, Barthel Index, and Modified Rankin Scale.
    Liu X; Zhou M; Zhao J; Gao Y; Wang Y; Zhou J; Wan L; Nie G; Wang Y
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():710852. PubMed ID: 35222236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in psychometric properties, cut-off scores, and outcomes between the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in pharmacotherapy-based stroke trials: systematic literature review.
    Balu S
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1329-41. PubMed ID: 19419341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a Self-Exercise Program on Activities of Daily Living in Patients After Acute Stroke: A Propensity Score Analysis Based on the Japan Association of Rehabilitation Database.
    Shiraishi N; Suzuki Y; Matsumoto D; Jeong S; Sugiyama M; Kondo K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 98(3):434-441. PubMed ID: 27633938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroke outcome assessment: Optimizing cutoff scores for the Longshi Scale, modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index.
    Zhou M; Liu X; Zha F; Liu F; Zhou J; Huang M; Luo W; Li W; Chen Y; Qu S; Xue K; Fu W; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251103. PubMed ID: 33984006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting outcome after stroke: the role of basic activities of daily living predicting outcome after stroke.
    Gialanella B; Santoro R; Ferlucci C
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Oct; 49(5):629-37. PubMed ID: 22641250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0-1 or 0-2?
    Weisscher N; Vermeulen M; Roos YB; de Haan RJ
    J Neurol; 2008 Jun; 255(6):867-74. PubMed ID: 18338195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stroke recovery profile and the Modified Rankin assessment.
    Lai SM; Duncan PW
    Neuroepidemiology; 2001 Feb; 20(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 11174042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining cut-off points in functional assessment scales in stroke.
    Balasch i Bernat M; Balasch i Parisi S; Sebastián EN; Moscardó LD; Ferri Campos J; López Bueno L
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2015; 37(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 26484508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Responsiveness of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale: A Comparison with the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index.
    Vanbellingen T; Ottiger B; Pflugshaupt T; Mehrholz J; Bohlhalter S; Nef T; Nyffeler T
    Front Neurol; 2016; 7():152. PubMed ID: 27725808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Barthel Index-based Supplementary Scales in patients with stroke.
    Lee YC; Yu WH; Hsueh IP; Chen SS; Hsieh CL
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Oct; 53(5):710-718. PubMed ID: 28178771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke.
    Beninato M; Gill-Body KM; Salles S; Stark PC; Black-Schaffer RM; Stein J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jan; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 16401435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.