These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15151328)

  • 1. Post emergent spraying demands, opportunities and benefits in field crop spraying practice.
    Kappel D; Joergensen L; Taylor B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt B):895-904. PubMed ID: 15151328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pesticide aerosol characteristics in the vicinity of an agricultural vehicle cab during application.
    Bémer D; Fismes J; Subra I; Blachère V; Protois JC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 17487720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The management of pesticide application dose in large tree crop canopies in Australian orchards.
    Drew HJ
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 20218511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimisation of sequence and orientation for used nozzles based on few, full boom distribution measurements.
    Maertens W; Nuyttens D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):989-95. PubMed ID: 16628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Importance of information on tillage practices in the modelling of environmental processes and in the use of environmental indicators.
    Lobb DA; Huffman E; Reicosky DC
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 82(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 17118526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occurrence of spray drift for different crop types: cereal, cereal stubble and grassland.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 19226823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental impact of adjuvants in crop protection.
    Ryckaert B; Spanoghe P; Steurbaut W; Heremans B; Haesaert G; de Coen W
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1087-91. PubMed ID: 16628960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced spraying techniques in fruit growing--the ISAFRUIT project--towards safer and better quality of fruit.
    Wenneker M; Van de Zande JC; Meuleman J; Doruchowski G; Balsari P; Marucco P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 20218512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efforts to stop groundwater pollution disappoint.
    Thacker PD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(16):4815-6. PubMed ID: 16955869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of adjuvants on flat fan spray nozzles.
    Spanoghe P; Steurbaut W; Van der Meeren P
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(4):47-51. PubMed ID: 15954262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comperative investigations of non chemical weed management methods in Hungary.
    Pali O; Reisinger P; Pomsar P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 18399454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining novel monitoring tools and precision application technologies for integrated high-tech crop protection in the future (a discussion document).
    Zijlstra C; Lund I; Justesen AF; Nicolaisen M; Jensen PK; Bianciotto V; Posta K; Balestrini R; Przetakiewicz A; Czembor E; van de Zande J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):616-25. PubMed ID: 21445942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hygienic characteristics of machines for the surface chemical protection of plants].
    Borisenko NF; Polishchuk DI
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1989; (3):36-9. PubMed ID: 2744553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crop competitiveness influenced by seeding dates and top-dress nitrogen rates.
    Fodor L; Lehoczky E; Fodorne Fehér E; Nagy P; Pálmai O
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):945-50. PubMed ID: 19226847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determination of potential dermal exposure during application of crop protection products by boom spraying.
    Senior PL; Lavers A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1992 Dec; 36(6):589-99. PubMed ID: 1471812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.