260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15151701)
1. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?
Hofer TP; Asch SM; Hayward RA; Rubenstein LV; Hogan MM; Adams J; Kerr EA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 May; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 15151701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1573-8. PubMed ID: 9370502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.
Hofer TP; Bernstein SJ; DeMonner S; Hayward RA
Med Care; 2000 Feb; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 10659689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care.
Hutchinson A; Coster JE; Cooper KL; McIntosh A; Walters SJ; Bath PA; Pearson M; Young TA; Rantell K; Campbell MJ; Ratcliffe J
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(10):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-144. PubMed ID: 20188021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges of audit of care on clinical quality indicators for hypertension and type 2 diabetes across four European countries.
Suija K; Kivisto K; Sarria-Santamera A; Kokko S; Liseckiene I; Bredehorst M; Jaruseviciene L; Papp R; Oona M; Kalda R
Fam Pract; 2015 Feb; 32(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 25411423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can computer-generated evidence-based care suggestions enhance evidence-based management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A randomized, controlled trial.
Tierney WM; Overhage JM; Murray MD; Harris LE; Zhou XH; Eckert GJ; Smith FE; Nienaber N; McDonald CJ; Wolinsky FD
Health Serv Res; 2005 Apr; 40(2):477-97. PubMed ID: 15762903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structured implicit review: a new method for monitoring nursing care quality.
Pearson ML; Lee JL; Chang BL; Elliott M; Kahn KL; Rubenstein LV
Med Care; 2000 Nov; 38(11):1074-91. PubMed ID: 11078049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus.
Fan VS; Reiber GE; Diehr P; Burman M; McDonell MB; Fihn SD
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 May; 20(5):452-9. PubMed ID: 15963172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Illustrating the patient journey through the care continuum: Leveraging structured primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data in Ontario, Canada using chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a case study.
Rayner J; Khan T; Chan C; Wu C
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Aug; 140():104159. PubMed ID: 32473567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of accreditation on the quality of chronic disease management: a comparative observational study.
van Doorn-Klomberg AL; Braspenning JC; Wolters RJ; Bouma M; Wensing M
BMC Fam Pract; 2014 Nov; 15():179. PubMed ID: 25366033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.
Luck J; Peabody JW; Dresselhaus TR; Lee M; Glassman P
Am J Med; 2000 Jun; 108(8):642-9. PubMed ID: 10856412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating the care of general medicine inpatients: how good is implicit review?
Hayward RA; McMahon LF; Bernard AM
Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(7):550-6. PubMed ID: 8442625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using structured implicit review to assess quality of care in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE).
Pacala JT; Kane RL; Atherly AJ; Smith MA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 Aug; 48(8):903-10. PubMed ID: 10968293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments.
Hulka BS; Romm FJ; Parkerson GR; Russell IT; Clapp NE; Johnson FS
Med Care; 1979 Mar; 17(3 Suppl):i-vi, 1-73. PubMed ID: 763009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality of care for chronic illness in primary care: opportunity for improvement in process and outcome measures.
Ornstein SM; Jenkins RG
Am J Manag Care; 1999 May; 5(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 10537868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.
Szeto HC; Coleman RK; Gholami P; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11814171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating quality of care: the role of peer review.
Harris CD; Bratzler DW
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2013 Jul; 106(7):279, 281-4. PubMed ID: 24032253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association between physician time-unlimited vs time-limited internal medicine board certification and ambulatory patient care quality.
Hayes J; Jackson JL; McNutt GM; Hertz BJ; Ryan JJ; Pawlikowski SA
JAMA; 2014 Dec; 312(22):2358-63. PubMed ID: 25490326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project].
Fischer J; Köhler D; Magnussen H
Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Rand Structured Implicit Review Instrument for Quality of Care Assessment.
Lefevre F; Feinglass J; Yarnold PR; Martin GJ; Webster J
Am J Med Sci; 1993 Apr; 305(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 8475947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
