BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15151967)

  • 1. Effect of multislice scanners on patient dose from routine CT examinations in East Anglia.
    Yates SJ; Pike LC; Goldstone KE
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):472-8. PubMed ID: 15151967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multislice scanners and radiation dose.
    Mahesh M; Hevezi JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19179243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in radiation dose between the same model of multislice CT scanner at different hospitals.
    Koller CJ; Eatough JP; Bettridge A
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Nov; 76(911):798-802. PubMed ID: 14623781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Population exposure to ionising radiation from CT examinations in Aosta Valley between 2001 and 2008.
    Catuzzo P; Aimonetto S; Zenone F; Fanelli G; Marchisio P; Meloni T; Pasquino M; Tofani S
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Dec; 83(996):1042-51. PubMed ID: 21088089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels.
    Treier R; Aroua A; Verdun FR; Samara E; Stuessi A; Trueb PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):244-54. PubMed ID: 20926508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A contribution to the establishment of diagnostic reference levels in CT.
    Hatziioannou K; Papanastassiou E; Delichas M; Bousbouras P
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Aug; 76(908):541-5. PubMed ID: 12893696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose.
    Wade JP; Weyman JC; Goldstone KE
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1146-51. PubMed ID: 9536906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality and patient dose in computed tomography examinations in Greece.
    Simantirakis G; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Dimitriou P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):129-32. PubMed ID: 21743078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of patient doses in 256-slice CT and 16-slice CT scanners.
    Mori S; Endo M; Nishizawa K; Murase K; Fujiwara H; Tanada S
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Jan; 79(937):56-61. PubMed ID: 16421406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation. Multislice computed tomography systems.
    Health Devices; 2002 May; 31(5):161-88. PubMed ID: 12449920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.
    Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose uniformity analysis among ten 16-slice same-model CT scanners.
    Erdi YE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 22261787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity.
    Jhaveri KS; Saini S; Levine LA; Piazzo DJ; Doncaster RJ; Halpern EF; Jordan PF; Thrall JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Oct; 177(4):769-72. PubMed ID: 11566670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary radiation outside the imaged volume of a multislice helical CT scan.
    Nicholson R; Fetherston S
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jun; 75(894):518-22. PubMed ID: 12124239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in adolescent thoracic imaging: 64-slice is preferable to 16-slice multislice CT.
    Arthurs OJ; Yates SJ; Set PA; Gibbons DA; Dixon AK
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 82(974):157-61. PubMed ID: 19001467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Establishment of a comprehensive set of regional DRLs for CT by means of electronic X-ray examination records.
    Charnock P; Dunn AF; Moores BM; Murphy J; Wilde R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):509-20. PubMed ID: 25717069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of Monte Carlo simulations to provide scanner-specific organ dose coefficients for contemporary CT.
    Jansen JT; Shrimpton PC
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 61(14):5356-77. PubMed ID: 27362736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.
    Van der Molen AJ; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Apr; 80(952):248-55. PubMed ID: 17038410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations.
    Fujii K; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Kawaura C
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Aug; 80(956):657-67. PubMed ID: 17762056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of clinical doses from computed tomography examinations in the Canadian province of Manitoba.
    A Elbakri I; D C Kirkpatrick I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(4):525-35. PubMed ID: 23803227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.