134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15152127)
1. Use of FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.
Kunert M; Gremmler B; Schleiting H; Ulbricht LJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 May; 16(5):240-2. PubMed ID: 15152127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Juergens CP; Leung DY; Crozier JA; Wong AM; Robinson JT; Lo S; Kachwalla H; Hopkins AP
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Oct; 63(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 15390237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Randomized comparison between collagen administration and pressure dressings for occlusion of the arterial puncture after coronary angiography and coronary dilatation].
Schräder R; Steinbacher S; Kaltenbach M
Z Kardiol; 1992 Sep; 81(9):507-11. PubMed ID: 1441705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [-Value of activated blood coagulation time in monitoring anticoagulation during coronary angioplasty-].
Kunert M; Sorgenicht R; Scheuble L; Ketteler T; Lürken E; Meyer I; Müller A; Emmerich K; Gülker H
Z Kardiol; 1996 Feb; 85(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 8650981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate femoral sheath removal after 6 French routine coronary angioplasty with a weight-adjusted low-dose heparin: results of a prospective registry.
Metz D; Brasselet C; Tabet E; Nazeyrollas P; Tassan-Mangina S; Deschildre A; Elaerts J; Blaise C
J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Jul; 11(7):416-20. PubMed ID: 10745564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.
Ekstrand H
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 16(6):A16-21. PubMed ID: 15202451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure.
Dewey RC; Bradley WA; Fink LI; Goldberg D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 16(6):A16. PubMed ID: 15202449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multicenter trial.
Chevalier B; Lancelin B; Koning R; Henry M; Gommeaux A; Pilliere R; Elbaz M; Lefevre T; Boughalem K; Marco J; Dupouy P;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 12594688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing bedrest following arterial puncture for coronary interventional procedures--impact on vascular complications: the BAC Trial.
Vlasic W; Almond D; Massel D
J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 13(12):788-92. PubMed ID: 11731689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-analysis of percutaneous vascular closure devices after diagnostic catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Vaitkus PT
J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 May; 16(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 15152128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized controlled trial of topical hemostasis pad use for achieving vascular hemostasis following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Nguyen N; Hasan S; Caufield L; Ling FS; Narins CR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 May; 69(6):801-7. PubMed ID: 17262862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral Arterial Hemostasis using the Angio-Sealª System after Coronary and Vascular Percutaneous Angioplasty and Stenting.
Cremonesi A; Castriota F; Tarantino F; Troiani E; Ricci E; El Jamal B ; Grattoni C; Noera G
J Invasive Cardiol; 1998 Oct; 10(8):464-469. PubMed ID: 10762823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions.
Rickli H; Unterweger M; Sütsch G; Brunner-La Rocca HP; Sagmeister M; Ammann P; Amann FW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Nov; 57(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 12410501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.
Martin JL; Pratsos A; Magargee E; Mayhew K; Pensyl C; Nunn M; Day F; Shapiro T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Jan; 71(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18098171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA.
Tron C; Koning R; Eltchaninoff H; Douillet R; Chassaing S; Sanchez-Giron C; Cribier A
J Interv Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 16(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 12800399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usefulness of collagen plugging with VasoSeal after PTCA as compared to manual compression with identical sheath dwell times.
Silber S; Björvik A; Mühling H; Rösch A
J Invasive Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 11 Suppl B():19B-24B. PubMed ID: 10745613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activated clotting time differential is a superior method of monitoring anticoagulation following coronary angioplasty.
Pitney MR; Kelly SA; Allan RM; Giles RW; McCredie M; Walsh WF
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Feb; 37(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 8808069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Six hour ambulation after elective coronary angioplasty and stenting with 7F guiding catheters ald low dose heparin.
Tengiz I; Ercan E; Bozdemir H; Durmaz O; Gurgun C; Nalbantgil I
Kardiol Pol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 14504634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of the radial and femoral arterial approaches for coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction].
Philippe F; Meziane T; Larrazet F; Dibie A
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Apr; 97(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 15182071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining best practice: comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures.
Benson LM; Wunderly D; Perry B; Kabboord J; Wenk T; Birdsall B; Vanderbos L; Roach V; Goole R; Crippen C; Nyirenda T; Rumsey L; Manguba G
Heart Lung; 2005; 34(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15761456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
