These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15152162)

  • 1. Comparison of the radial and femoral approaches in left main PCI: a retrospective study.
    Ziakas A; Klinke P; Mildenberger R; Fretz E; Williams MB; Della Siega A; Kinloch RD; Hilton JD
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 15152162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study.
    Ziakas A; Klinke P; Mildenberger R; Fretz E; Williams M; Della Siega A; Kinloch D; Hilton D
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 16093218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach.
    Hsueh SK; Hsieh YK; Wu CJ; Fang CY; Youssef AA; Chen CJ; Chen SM; Yang CH; Yip HK; Chen MC; Fu M; Cheng CI
    Chang Gung Med J; 2008; 31(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 18567420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the radial and the femoral approaches in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly.
    Ziakas A; Gomma A; McDonald J; Klinke P; Hilton D
    Acute Card Care; 2007; 9(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 17573583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Yan ZX; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Liu YY; Shi DM; Guo YH; Cheng WJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 May; 121(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 18701040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
    Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study.
    Alidoosti M; Salarifar M; Zeinali AM; Kassaian SE; Dehkordi MR
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2007 Mar; 7():7. PubMed ID: 17335586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment versus percutaneous coronary angioplasty in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions.
    Latacz P; Rostoff P; Gackowski A; El-Massri N; Konduracka E; Gajos G; Matysek J; Piwowarska W; Zmudka K
    Kardiol Pol; 2009 Aug; 67(8A):1004-12. PubMed ID: 19784905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery.
    Hetherington SL; Adam Z; Morley R; de Belder MA; Hall JA; Muir DF; Sutton AG; Swanson N; Wright RA
    Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(19):1612-8. PubMed ID: 19596690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of door-to-balloon times for primary PCI using transradial versus transfemoral approach.
    Pancholy S; Patel T; Sanghvi K; Thomas M; Patel T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jun; 75(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 20517957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.
    Ranjan A; Patel TM; Shah SC; Malhotra H; Patel R; Vayada N; Pothiwala R; Fonseca K; Tanwar NS
    Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 16521638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonrandomized comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in octogenarians.
    Rodés-Cabau J; Deblois J; Bertrand OF; Mohammadi S; Courtis J; Larose E; Dagenais F; Déry JP; Mathieu P; Rousseau M; Barbeau G; Baillot R; Gleeton O; Perron J; Nguyen CM; Roy L; Doyle D; De Larochellière R; Bogaty P; Voisine P
    Circulation; 2008 Dec; 118(23):2374-81. PubMed ID: 19029471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of the radial and femoral arterial approaches for coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction].
    Philippe F; Meziane T; Larrazet F; Dibie A
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2004 Apr; 97(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 15182071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.
    Buszman PE; Kiesz SR; Bochenek A; Peszek-Przybyla E; Szkrobka I; Debinski M; Bialkowska B; Dudek D; Gruszka A; Zurakowski A; Milewski K; Wilczynski M; Rzeszutko L; Buszman P; Szymszal J; Martin JL; Tendera M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 51(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 18237682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial lesions in the era of drug-eluting stents.
    Freeman M; Clark DJ; Andrianopoulos N; Duffy SJ; Lim HS; Brennan A; Charter K; Shaw J; Horrigan M; Ajani AE; Sebastian M; Reid CM; Farouque HM;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 73(6):763-8. PubMed ID: 19309731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical results of unprotected left main coronary stenting.
    Ben-Dor I; Vaknin-Assa H; Lev E; Brosh D; Fuchs S; Assali A; Kornowski R
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2009 Mar; 11(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 19544705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients on chronic hemodialysis: does a drug-eluting stent have an impact on clinical outcome?
    Manabe S; Shimokawa T; Fukui T; Fumimoto KU; Ozawa N; Seki H; Takanashi S
    J Card Surg; 2009; 24(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 19438773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial versus nonostial narrowing of the major epicardial coronary arteries.
    Mavromatis K; Ghazzal Z; Veledar E; Diamandopoulos L; Weintraub WS; Douglas JS; Kalynych AM
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 94(5):583-7. PubMed ID: 15342287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization.
    Lenzen MJ; Boersma E; Bertrand ME; Maier W; Moris C; Piscione F; Sechtem U; Stahle E; Widimsky P; de Jaegere P; Scholte op Reimer WJ; Mercado N; Wijns W;
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Jun; 26(12):1169-79. PubMed ID: 15802360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five French versus 6 French PCI: a case control study of efficacy, safety and outcome.
    Rakhit RD; Matter C; Windecker S; Garachemani AR; Seiler C; Eberli FR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2002 Nov; 14(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 12403895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.