670 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15152826)
1. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study.
Moses O; Artzi Z; Sculean A; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Romanos GE; Nemcovsky CE
J Periodontol; 2006 Feb; 77(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16460244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 2: Histological evaluation.
McGuire MK; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14514225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Amarante ES; Leknes KN; Skavland J; Lie T
J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):989-98. PubMed ID: 10914803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession.
Cueva MA; Boltchi FE; Hallmon WW; Nunn ME; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Rees T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):949-56. PubMed ID: 15341352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Tal H; Moses O; Zohar R; Meir H; Nemcovsky C
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 12546089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain) or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 23998158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET
J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
