288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15153123)
1. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK.
Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 50(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 15153123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015).
Silvestre JF; Mercader P; González-Pérez R; Hervella-Garcés M; Sanz-Sánchez T; Córdoba S; Sánchez-Pérez J; Heras-Mendoza F; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gatica-Ortega ME; Pastor-NIeto MA; Zaragoza V; Carrascosa JM; García-Bravo B; Ruiz-González I; Borrego L; Sánchez-Pedreño P; de Frutos JO; Armario-Hita JC; García-Gavín J; Fernández-Redondo V
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Feb; 80(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 30430587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
Trattner A; David M
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rosacea and contact allergy to cosmetics and topical medicaments--retrospective analysis of multicentre surveillance data 1995-2002.
Jappe U; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Feb; 52(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 15725288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patch test results with patients' own perfumes, deodorants and shaving lotions: results of the IVDK 1998-2002.
Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A; Frosch PJ
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 17309462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*.
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Uter W;
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Feb; 50(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 15128316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Periorbital dermatitis--a recalcitrant disease: causes and differential diagnoses.
Feser A; Plaza T; Vogelgsang L; Mahler V
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 159(4):858-63. PubMed ID: 18721191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further important sensitizers in patients sensitive to fragrances.
Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 12423404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
