BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15153319)

  • 1. Reattendance in the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme.
    Bulliard JL; De Landtsheer JP; Levi F
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 15153319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Participation in Swiss mammography screening programmes: key role of physicians].
    Bulliard JL; de Landtsheer JP; Levi F
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2005 Sep; 94(36):1381-7. PubMed ID: 16190371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
    Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associations in breast and colon cancer screening behavior in women.
    Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Patterson SK; Bernstein SJ
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Apr; 12(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 15831418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance.
    Gram IT; Lund E
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 18416955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
    Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography use and factors associated with its use after the introduction of breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.
    Luengo-Matos S; Polo-Santos M; Saz-Parkinson Z
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Jun; 15(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 16679867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey.
    Duport N; Ancelle-Park R
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2006 Jun; 15(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 16679864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ascertainment and evaluation of interval cancers in population-based mammography screening programmes: a collaborative study in four European centres.
    Törnberg S; Codd M; Rodrigues V; Segnan N; Ponti A
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 15814019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
    Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's opinions about attending for breast cancer screening: stability of cognitive determinants during three rounds of screening.
    Drossaert CH; Boer H; Seydel ER
    Br J Health Psychol; 2005 Feb; 10(Pt 1):133-49. PubMed ID: 15826339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profile of women not attending in the Swiss Mammography Screening Pilot Programme.
    Bulliard JL; de Landtsheer JP; Levi F
    Breast; 2004 Aug; 13(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 15325662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of an organized, nationwide breast cancer screening programme on non-organized mammography activities.
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Pintér I; Battyány I; Ember I
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 18416949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interval cancer incidence and episode sensitivity in the Norrbotten Mammography Screening Programme, Sweden.
    Bordás P; Jonsson H; Nyström L; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 19349530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of physician and patient characteristics on adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations.
    Abdel-Malek N; Chiarelli AM; Sloan M; Stewart DE; Mai V; Howlett RI
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Feb; 17(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 18090910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of a breast cancer screening programme in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Hadi N; Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A; Talei AR; Arasteh MM; Kazerooni T
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(2-3):386-92. PubMed ID: 15339128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast cancer early detection, health beliefs, and cancer worries in randomly selected women with and without a family history of breast cancer.
    Cohen M
    Psychooncology; 2006 Oct; 15(10):873-83. PubMed ID: 16374894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.