These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154170)

  • 1. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect on survey return rates of having a signed or unsigned postcard as the third-wave mailing.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Akpanudo S; Kleinfelder J
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1099-102. PubMed ID: 12931924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of a college pen incentive on survey response rate among recent college graduates.
    Stange JP; Zyzanski SJ
    Eval Rev; 2011 Feb; 35(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 21362640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias.
    Asch DA
    Epidemiology; 1996 Sep; 7(5):550-1. PubMed ID: 8862992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys. A randomized trial and a meta-analysis.
    Etter JF; Cucherat M; Perneger TV
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 12026752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
    Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
    Iredell H; Shaw T; Howat P; James R; Granich J
    Health Educ Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15031275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Questionnaires--how to reach high response rates?].
    Zwisler JE; Jarbøl DE; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Feb; 166(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 15005038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. E-mail versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs.
    Raziano DB; Jayadevappa R; Valenzula D; Weiner M; Lavizzo-Mourey R
    Gerontologist; 2001 Dec; 41(6):799-804. PubMed ID: 11723348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polling patients with self-administered surveys.
    Dommeyer CJ; Feldman J; Davis W
    Health Mark Q; 1995; 12(3):95-106. PubMed ID: 10143475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elderly nonrespondents to a mail survey: a telephone follow-up.
    Strayer M; Kuthy R; Sutton S
    Spec Care Dentist; 1993; 13(6):245-8. PubMed ID: 8042133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.