These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154202)

  • 1. Effects of preshift small magnitude of reward received during goalbox placements on the negative contrast effect.
    Calef RS; Choban MC; Glenney KR; Calef RA; Mace EM; Cummings TD
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):683-6. PubMed ID: 15154202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scaling relative incentive value: different adjustments to incentive downshift in pigeons and rats.
    Pellegrini S; López Seal MF; Papini MR
    Behav Processes; 2008 Nov; 79(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 18755254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posttraining intraamygdala infusions of oxotremorine and propranolol modulate storage of memory for reductions in reward magnitude.
    Salinas JA; Introini-Collison IB; Dalmaz C; McGaugh JL
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1997 Jul; 68(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9195589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aggression in rats as a function of target location in a double alley.
    Matzel LD
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 6542754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent positive and negative goalbox events produce runway behaviors comparable to those of cocaine-reinforced rats.
    Geist TD; Ettenberg A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997; 57(1-2):145-50. PubMed ID: 9164565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successive negative contrast effect in instrumental runway behaviour: a study with Roman high- (RHA) and Roman low- (RLA) avoidance rats.
    Rosas JM; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Escarabajal M; Gómez MJ; de la Torre L; Agüero A; Tobeña A; Fernández-Teruel A; Torres C
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 185(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17764760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an operant successive negative contrast task as a method to study affective state in rodents.
    Mitchell EN; Marston HM; Nutt DJ; Robinson ES
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 234(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 22732261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of partial reinforcement on instrumental successive negative contrast in inbred Roman High- (RHA-I) and Low- (RLA-I) Avoidance rats.
    Cuenya L; Sabariego M; Donaire R; Fernández-Teruel A; Tobeña A; Gómez MJ; Mustaca A; Torres C
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Mar; 105(5):1112-6. PubMed ID: 22210523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of delay of reinforcement with reduction of confinement in the goal-box and elimination of handling immediately following runway traversal.
    Calef RS; Choban MC; Glenney KR; Calef RA; Bass T; Rivers AL
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1147-51. PubMed ID: 8643777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Withdrawal of presession saccharin suppresses food-maintained responding in rats.
    Rudski J; Gurmankin C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 9638732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Runway performance as a function of pellet habituation.
    Davis SF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):252. PubMed ID: 4415661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Frustration Effect when Punishment is Paired with Reward.
    Sgro JA; Porterfield LS
    J Gen Psychol; 1978 Apr; 98(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 28136699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of dietary fibers with different fermentation characteristics on feeding motivation in adult female pigs.
    Souza da Silva C; Bolhuis JE; Gerrits WJ; Kemp B; van den Borne JJ
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Feb; 110-111():148-57. PubMed ID: 23313406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incentive loss and hippocampal gene expression in inbred Roman high- (RHA-I) and Roman low- (RLA-I) avoidance rats.
    Sabariego M; Morón I; Gómez MJ; Donaire R; Tobeña A; Fernández-Teruel A; Martínez-Conejero JA; Esteban FJ; Torres C
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():62-70. PubMed ID: 24055493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anticipatory cues can interfere with inhibitory operant behavior in the rat.
    Persinger MA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Aug; 87(1):304-6. PubMed ID: 9760661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involvement of the rat anterior cingulate cortex in control of instrumental responses guided by reward expectancy.
    Schweimer J; Hauber W
    Learn Mem; 2005; 12(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 15930509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate consummatory but not instrumental successive negative contrast in rats.
    Sastre A; Reilly S
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16530861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A possible social relative reward effect: Influences of outcome inequity between rats during operant responding.
    Douglas HM; Halverstadt BA; Reinhart-Anez P; Webber ES; Cromwell HC
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():459-469. PubMed ID: 29990520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age of first appearance of simultaneous and successive negative contrast in infant rats.
    Stanton M; Lobaugh N; Amsel A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jul; 10(3):376-89. PubMed ID: 6747555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caudate nucleus lesions impair the ability of rats to learn a simple straight-alley task.
    Kirkby RJ; Polgar S; Coyle IR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):499-502. PubMed ID: 7255063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.