282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154744)
1. Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment.
Verdonk ML; Berdini V; Hartshorn MJ; Mooij WT; Murray CW; Taylor RD; Watson P
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):793-806. PubMed ID: 15154744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of structure- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols considering hit list complementarity and enrichment factors.
Krüger DM; Evers A
ChemMedChem; 2010 Jan; 5(1):148-58. PubMed ID: 19908272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of scoring functions on enrichment in docking-based virtual screening: an application study on renin inhibitors.
Krovat EM; Langer T
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1123-9. PubMed ID: 15154781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
Bar-Haim S; Aharon A; Ben-Moshe T; Marantz Y; Senderowitz H
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structure-based virtual screening with supervised consensus scoring: evaluation of pose prediction and enrichment factors.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 18318474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FLAP: GRID molecular interaction fields in virtual screening. validation using the DUD data set.
Cross S; Baroni M; Carosati E; Benedetti P; Clementi S
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1442-50. PubMed ID: 20690627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ConsDock: A new program for the consensus analysis of protein-ligand interactions.
Paul N; Rognan D
Proteins; 2002 Jun; 47(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 12001231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening.
Onodera K; Satou K; Hirota H
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1609-18. PubMed ID: 17602548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-based virtual ligand screening with LigandFit: pose prediction and enrichment of compound collections.
Montes M; Miteva MA; Villoutreix BO
Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(3):712-25. PubMed ID: 17510958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
