These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154751)
1. Induction of decision trees via evolutionary programming. DeLisle RK; Dixon SL J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):862-70. PubMed ID: 15154751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic programming for the induction of decision trees to model ecotoxicity data. Buontempo FV; Wang XZ; Mwense M; Horan N; Young A; Osborn D J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(4):904-12. PubMed ID: 16045284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of decision trees using genetic programming for modelling ecotoxicity data: adaptive discretization of real-valued endpoints. Wang XZ; Buontempo FV; Young A; Osborn D SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):451-71. PubMed ID: 17050186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A decision tree--based method for the differential diagnosis of Aortic Stenosis from Mitral Regurgitation using heart sounds. Pavlopoulos SA; Stasis AC; Loukis EN Biomed Eng Online; 2004 Jun; 3(1):21. PubMed ID: 15225347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment. James KE; White RF; Kraemer HC Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):3019-35. PubMed ID: 16149128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 10. Predictions of P-glycoprotein inhibitors using recursive partitioning and naive Bayesian classification techniques. Chen L; Li Y; Zhao Q; Peng H; Hou T Mol Pharm; 2011 Jun; 8(3):889-900. PubMed ID: 21413792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binary recursive partitioning: background, methods, and application to psychology. Merkle EC; Shaffer VA Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):161-81. PubMed ID: 21506949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Supporting medical decisions with vector decision trees. Sprogar M; Kokol P; Zorman M; Podgorelec V; Yamamoto R; Masuda G; Sakamoto N Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):552-6. PubMed ID: 11604801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Elith J; Leathwick JR; Hastie T J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 18397250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the quality of tree-based protein classification. Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision forest: combining the predictions of multiple independent decision tree models. Tong W; Hong H; Fang H; Xie Q; Perkins R J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 12653517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using recursive partitioning analysis to evaluate compound selection methods. Young SS; Hawkins DM Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 275():317-34. PubMed ID: 15141119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seeing the trees despite the forest: applying recursive partitioning to the evaluation of drug treatment retention. Hellemann G; Conner BT; Anglin MD; Longshore D J Subst Abuse Treat; 2009 Jan; 36(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18599252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the induction of fuzzy classification rule systems. Setzkorn C; Paton RC Biosystems; 2005 Aug; 81(2):101-12. PubMed ID: 15939532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of preterm birth in symptomatic women using decision tree modeling for biomarkers. Hill JL; Campbell MK; Zou GY; Challis JR; Reid G; Chisaka H; Bocking AD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 198(4):468.e1-7; discussion 468.e7-9. PubMed ID: 18395044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of recursion forests in the sequential screening process: consensus selection by multiple recursion trees. van Rhee AM J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 12767153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A fuzzy decision tree for fault classification. Zio E; Baraldi P; Popescu IC Risk Anal; 2008 Feb; 28(1):49-67. PubMed ID: 18304106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Topological models for prediction of physico-chemical, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of antihistaminic drugs using decision tree and moving average analysis. Dureja H; Gupta S; Madan AK Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2009; 2(4):353-70. PubMed ID: 20090176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]