These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154753)

  • 1. Novel scoring functions comprising QXP, SASA, and protein side-chain entropy terms.
    Giordanetto F; Cotesta S; Catana C; Trosset JY; Vulpetti A; Stouten PF; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):882-93. PubMed ID: 15154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SFCscore: scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes.
    Sotriffer CA; Sanschagrin P; Matter H; Klebe G
    Proteins; 2008 Nov; 73(2):395-419. PubMed ID: 18442132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.
    Krammer A; Kirchhoff PD; Jiang X; Venkatachalam CM; Waldman M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Apr; 23(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 15781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration.
    Li S; Xi L; Wang C; Li J; Lei B; Liu H; Yao X
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Apr; 30(6):900-9. PubMed ID: 18785151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a novel scoring method based on solvent accessible surface area descriptors.
    Núñez S; Venhorst J; Kruse CG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 20356089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models.
    Cotesta S; Giordanetto F; Trosset JY; Crivori P; Kroemer RT; Stouten PF; Vulpetti A
    Proteins; 2005 Sep; 60(4):629-43. PubMed ID: 16028223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark.
    Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM
    J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2216-25. PubMed ID: 20329755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
    Gohlke H; Hendlich M; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 10623530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical PLS modeling for predicting the binding of a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein-ligand complexes.
    Lindström A; Pettersson F; Almqvist F; Berglund A; Kihlberg J; Linusson A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1154-67. PubMed ID: 16711735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?
    Marsden PM; Puvanendrampillai D; Mitchell JB; Glen RC
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3267-73. PubMed ID: 15534704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.