These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15154787)

  • 1. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1177-85. PubMed ID: 15154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3256-66. PubMed ID: 15534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients.
    Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Alex A; Loesel J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1840-8. PubMed ID: 15446844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverse frequency weighting of fragments for similarity-based virtual screening.
    Arif SM; Holliday JD; Willett P
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1340-9. PubMed ID: 20672867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing the effectiveness of similarity-based virtual screening using nearest-neighbor information.
    Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
    J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(22):7049-54. PubMed ID: 16250664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance.
    Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ranking methods for virtual screening in lead-discovery programs.
    Wilton D; Willett P; Lawson K; Mullier G
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 12653510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
    Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shannon entropy-based fingerprint similarity search strategy.
    Wang Y; Geppert H; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1687-91. PubMed ID: 19583222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual screening using binary kernel discrimination: analysis of pesticide data.
    Wilton DJ; Harrison RF; Willett P; Delaney J; Lawson K; Mullier G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 16562974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How similar are similarity searching methods? A principal component analysis of molecular descriptor space.
    Bender A; Jenkins JL; Scheiber J; Sukuru SC; Glick M; Davies JW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 19123924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementing relevance feedback in ligand-based virtual screening using Bayesian inference network.
    Abdo A; Salim N; Ahmed A
    J Biomol Screen; 2011 Oct; 16(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 21862688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of field-based similarity searching methods: CatShape, FBSS, and ROCS.
    Moffat K; Gillet VJ; Whittle M; Bravi G; Leach AR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):719-29. PubMed ID: 18351728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Support-vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference compounds.
    Geppert H; Horváth T; Gärtner T; Wrobel S; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):742-6. PubMed ID: 18318473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance of feature combinations for similarity searching using general or activity class-directed molecular fingerprints.
    Lounkine E; Hu Y; Batista J; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):561-70. PubMed ID: 19434896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rendering conventional molecular fingerprints for virtual screening independent of molecular complexity and size effects.
    Nisius B; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Jun; 5(6):859-68. PubMed ID: 20425878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Similarity search profiles as a diagnostic tool for the analysis of virtual screening calculations.
    Xue L; Godden JW; Stahura FL; Bajorath J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1275-81. PubMed ID: 15272835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Similarity by compression.
    Melville JL; Riley JF; Hirst JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 17238245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.