These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15155031)

  • 1. Warm and homely or cold and beautiful? Sex differences in trading off traits in mate selection.
    Fletcher GJ; Tither JM; O'Loughlin C; Friesen M; Overall N
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Jun; 30(6):659-72. PubMed ID: 15155031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.
    Li NP; Bailey JM; Kenrick DT; Linsenmeier JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(6):947-55. PubMed ID: 12051582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.
    Little AC; Caldwell CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1119-27. PubMed ID: 21901646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection.
    Wood D; Brumbaugh CC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 96(6):1226-44. PubMed ID: 19469598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.
    Jonason PK; Raulston T; Rotolo A
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 22468419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.
    Li NP; Kenrick DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):468-89. PubMed ID: 16594832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I'm hot, so i'd say you're not: the influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection.
    Montoya RM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1315-31. PubMed ID: 18599658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of life-history trade-offs in mate attractiveness and health: comment on Weeden and Sabini (2005).
    Geary DC
    Psychol Bull; 2005 Sep; 131(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 16187850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: standards, accuracy, and sex differences.
    Fletcher GJ; Kerr PS; Li NP; Valentine KA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Apr; 40(4):540-50. PubMed ID: 24501043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowing your own mate value: sex-specific personality effects on the accuracy of expected mate choices.
    Back MD; Penke L; Schmukle SC; Asendorpf JB
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Aug; 22(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 21724949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.
    Li NP; Yong JC; Tov W; Sng O; Fletcher GJ; Valentine KA; Jiang YF; Balliet D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):757-76. PubMed ID: 23915041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.
    Waynforth D
    Hum Nat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 26192277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.
    Mathes EW; Bielser A; Cassell T; Summers S; Witowski A
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):502-11. PubMed ID: 17153821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
    Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some evidence about character and mate selection.
    Hanko K; Master S; Sabini J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Jun; 30(6):732-42. PubMed ID: 15155037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile.
    Tovée MJ; Cornelissen PL
    Br J Psychol; 2001 May; 92(Pt 2):391-402. PubMed ID: 11417788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sex, status, and mating cues on expected aggressive responses.
    Terrell HK; Patock-Peckham JA; Nagoshi CT
    Aggress Behav; 2009; 35(3):259-73. PubMed ID: 19291759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of a parenting prime on sex differences in mate selection criteria.
    Millar MG; Ostlund NM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1459-68. PubMed ID: 17030888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.
    van Straaten I; Engels RC; Finkenauer C; Holland RW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Dec; 37(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 17682936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
    Vanderlaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Aug; 37(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 17216358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.