These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15155914)

  • 1. Praise, for a change.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2004 May; 304(5674):1077. PubMed ID: 15155914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
    Price AR
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review and federal regulations.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Jan; 350(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 14711908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
    Scheetz MD
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current ethical issues in research.
    Horowitz HS
    J Am Coll Dent; 1990; 57(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 2174932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulatory policy. White House softens disputed peer-review plan.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Apr; 304(5670):496-7. PubMed ID: 15105462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
    Price AR
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disclosure and disinterest.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5654):15. PubMed ID: 14704397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plagiarize or perish?
    Ready T
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):494. PubMed ID: 16675986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sitting in judgement.
    Check E
    Nature; 2002 Sep; 419(6905):332-3. PubMed ID: 12353003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beautification and fraud.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2006 Feb; 8(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 16450003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science and government. Disclosure in regulatory science.
    Michaels D; Wagner W
    Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5653):2073. PubMed ID: 14684806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct. Shalala takes watchdog office out of the hunt.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1999 Oct; 286(5441):883. PubMed ID: 10577232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The president's scientist.
    Lane NF; Matthews KR
    Cell; 2009 Nov; 139(5):847-50. PubMed ID: 19945370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific misconduct. The multiple repercussions of a fudged grant application.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5616):40. PubMed ID: 12677036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research misconduct events increased yet again in 2002.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2. PubMed ID: 14682337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.