These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15156110)

  • 1. Feasibility study of custom hip stem design based on X-ray films.
    Wei HW; Chung MY; Huang VW; Cheng CK
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 15156110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Assessment of implant position of CTX-custom-made stems with EBRA-FCA in 107 cases of total joint replacement].
    Rittmeister M; Eisenbeis K; Hanusek S; Yanik-Karaca Z; Starker M; Arabmotlagh M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 15614644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of stem structure on stress distribution of a custom-made hip prosthesis.
    Li X; Li D; Lian Q; Guo H; Jin Z
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Nov; 224(11):1275-84. PubMed ID: 21218690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design of custom hip stem prostheses using three-dimensional CT modeling.
    Robertson DD; Walker PS; Granholm JW; Nelson PC; Weiss PJ; Fishman EK; Magid D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1987; 11(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 3655042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT-based accuracy of implanting custom-made endoprostheses.
    Götze C; Vieth V; Meier N; Böttner F; Steinbeck J; Hackenberg L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):856-62. PubMed ID: 16023274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Custom design of hip joint prostheses based on X-ray films].
    Ma R; He Y; Xue W; Dai K; Wang C
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Aug; 21(4):666-9. PubMed ID: 15357457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.
    Adam F; Hammer DS; Pape D; Kohn D
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Jun; 122(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 12070644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new technique for morphologic measurement of the femur. Its application for Japanese patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip.
    Miura T; Matsumoto T; Nishino M; Kaneuji A; Sugimori T; Tomita K
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1998; 57(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 9926259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The femoral canal fill of two different cementless stem designs. The accuracy of radiographs compared to computed tomographic scanning.
    Laine HJ; Pajamäki KJ; Moilanen T; Lehto MU
    Int Orthop; 2001; 25(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 11561492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconstruction of patient-specific femurs using X-ray and sparse CT images.
    Koh K; Kim YH; Kim K; Park WM
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Jul; 41(7):421-6. PubMed ID: 21641590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential of first arriving signal to assess cortical bone geometry at the Hip with QUS: a model based study.
    Grondin J; Grimal Q; Engelke K; Laugier P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):656-66. PubMed ID: 20350690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A-mode ultrasound-based intra-femoral bone cement detection and 3D reconstruction in RTHR.
    Heger S; Mumme T; Sellei R; De La Fuente M; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 17538789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting proximal femur rotation by morphological analyses using translucent 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Han CD; Lee YH; Yang KH; Yang IH; Lee WS; Park YJ; Park KK
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1747-52. PubMed ID: 23001351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Design of cementless femoral prostheses adaptive to secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint].
    Okumura Y; Imura S; Takedani H; Bou A
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 67(10):897-910. PubMed ID: 8263362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Change in the CCD angle and the femoral anteversion angle by hip prosthesis implantation].
    Schidlo C; Becker C; Jansson V; Refior J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 10441833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of fit and fill between anatomic stem and straight tapered stem using virtual implantation on the ORTHODOC workstation.
    Haraguchi K; Sugano N; Nishii T; Koyama T; Nishihara S; Yoshikawa H; Ochi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 11892005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative templating of femoral components on plain X-rays. Rotational evaluation with synthetic X-rays on ORTHODOC.
    Hananouchi T; Sugano N; Nakamura N; Nishii T; Miki H; Yamamura M; Yoshikawa H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2007 Jul; 127(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 17522880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.
    Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Haraguchi K; Sakai T; Ochi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 1998; 3(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 10379982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images.
    Tomazevic D; Likar B; Slivnik T; Pernus F
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1407-16. PubMed ID: 14606674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.